[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Moment Putin’s sickly war dog Kadyrov appears bloated with discoloured hands as he admits he ‘might not live long’, alexander_busek wrote:

I’ve reached this conclusion. There are no good guys on either side. None. So it’s best that the United States stay completely out of it.

One side - the Russian side - has nukes aimed at America's heartland. So I've reached this conclusion. It's best that Russia fail in its 16-month-long invasion of Ukraine.

America has had absolutely no geopolitical reason to yearn for a weaker Ukraine. America has every reason to hope for a weakened, emasculated, and/or dissected Russia.

Regards,

Russia is not in favor of first strikes like Zelensky said he himself wanted (Wanted NATO to perform pro-active first nuke strikes on Russia) - nukes are if NATO (includes US) threatens survival of Russia more than that country is likely to withstand.

America has every geopolitical reason to hope the Ukraine is dismantled. The US Biowarfare labs, the epic money laundering, the 2020 election interference, and mainly the fact that Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, the DNC and other criminal 'elites' NEED the Ukraine as Deep State Headquarters to remain in power.

[alexander_busek]

Russia is not in favor of first strikes like Zelensky said he himself wanted (Wanted NATO to perform pro-active first nuke strikes on Russia) - nukes are if NATO (includes US) threatens survival of Russia more than that country is likely to withstand.

What Zelensky says in this regard is totally irrelevant. The main thing is: He doesn't advocate nuking America (while Putin does). In my American eyes, that makes Zelensky one of the "good guys!"

America has every geopolitical reason to hope the Ukraine is dismantled. The US Biowarfare labs, the epic money laundering [blah-blah-blah]

America has far more reason to wish for the dismantling of nuclear-armed Russia.

Regards,