Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AWS: IPv4 addresses cost too much, so you’re going to pay
The Register ^ | 31 July 2023 | Dan Robinson

Posted on 08/01/2023 12:01:45 PM PDT by ShadowAce

Cloud giant AWS will start charging customers for public IPv4 addresses from next year, claiming it is forced to do this because of the increasing scarcity of these and to encourage the use of IPv6 instead.

It is now four years since we officially ran out of IPv4 ranges to allocate, and since then, those wanting a new public IPv4 address have had to rely on address ranges being recovered, either from from organizations that close down or those that return addresses they no longer require as they migrate to IPv6.

If Amazon's cloud division is to be believed, the difficulty in obtaining public IPv4 addresses has seen the cost of acquiring a single address rise by more than 300 percent over the past five years, and as we all know, the business is a little short of cash at the moment, so is having to pass these costs on to users.

"This change reflects our own costs and is also intended to encourage you to be a bit more frugal with your use of public IPv4 addresses and to think about accelerating your adoption of IPv6 as a modernization and conservation measure," writes AWS Chief Evangelist Jeff Barr, on the company news blog.

The update will come into effect on February 1, 2024, when AWS customers will see a charge of $0.005 (half a cent) per IP address per hour for all public IPv4 addresses. These charges will apparently apply whether the address is attached to a service or not, and like many AWS charges, appear inconsequential at first glance but can mount up over time if a customer is using many of them.

These charges will apply to all AWS services including EC2, Relational Database Service (RDS) database instances, Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) nodes, and will apply across all AWS regions, the company said.

However, customers will not be charged for IP addresses that they own and bring to AWS using Amazon's BYOIP feature. AWS offers a free tier for EC2, and this will include 750 hours of public IPv4 address usage per month for the first 12 months, starting from the same date the charges do.

To try and help customers get a handle on how this might affect their AWS bill, the company said it is adding information on public IPv4 addresses to the AWS Cost and Usage Report (CUR). It also unveiled a new feature of Amazon VPC IP Address Management (IPAM) called Public IP Insights, which is intended to simplify analysis and auditing of public IPv4 addresses.

10 years later

It is now more than a decade since IPv6 was officially launched, but adoption has been slow and gradual as many organizations saw little need to change at first, especially when managing a migration from the older standard to the new one was likely to be complex.

Although the world officially ran out of unallocated IPv4 addresses in 2019, according to the European regional internet registry RIPE NCC, it posted figures last year showing that the IPv4 routing table still has six times as many entries as that for IPv6.

However, this apparent disparity may be slightly misleading, it claimed, as internet registries have taken advantage of the massive 128-bit address space of IPv6 to ensure that "organizations receive blocks that are, in many cases, large enough to cover all their future addressing needs" when allocating new address ranges, whereas IPv4 saw ever smaller allocation sizes as the address space filled up.

"Even once all networks have deployed and announced IPv6, we can expect the routing table to be smaller than that for IPv4," RIPE NCC claimed.

RIPE NCC also quoted IPv6 adoption by end users last year, as estimated by Google and APNIC, the regional internet address registry for the Asia-Pacific region, as being between 30 percent and 40 percent.

But as The Register wrote back when IPv4 addresses officially ran out, it is going to be with us for a good few years yet. RIPE NCC was predicting then that it might take "five to 10 years" before the world starts to truly abandon the IPv4 address space. Four years of that have already passed, and IPv4 still seems to be going as strong as ever. ®


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: amazon; internet; ipv4; network

1 posted on 08/01/2023 12:01:45 PM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; JosephW; martin_fierro; Still Thinking; zeugma; Vinnie; ironman; Egon; raybbr; AFreeBird; ...

2 posted on 08/01/2023 12:02:01 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

You will own nothing about be happy.


3 posted on 08/01/2023 12:05:41 PM PDT by Jonty30 (If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
I suspect class C IPv4 networks will continue to be standard practice inside homes and small offices. IPv6 requires the software developer to engage a new library to deal with the IPv6 client/server structure as well as DNS and routers. The infrastructure for IPv6 remains largely incomplete. Security software that covers IPv6 is also behind the curve.
4 posted on 08/01/2023 12:09:14 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Most home and businesses will to use the private non-routable IPv4 addresses for a quite awhile for inside networks and most home uses have no need for a public IP address except what gets assigned to their public interface of the router/modem etc.

I’m surprised Cloud companies like AWS haven’t started charging larger more sophisticated companies for public IP addresses before now


5 posted on 08/01/2023 12:17:45 PM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

IPv6 is technically much more complex than IPv4 so there is the big hurdle that many are unwilling to jump for what many perceive to be a minimal gain. Will there be an IPv6-lite?


6 posted on 08/01/2023 12:28:43 PM PDT by frogjerk (More people have died trusting the government than not trusting the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

Amazon bought half of the 18. space from MIT in 2017. I remember having to change IPs on servers. The price was a significant amount. Amazon is finally getting around to monetizing this scarce resource. Go capitalism.


7 posted on 08/01/2023 1:30:45 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

I remember around 20 years ago, I was working for a small consulting firm here in Jacksonville, that housed servers for small businesses, in the “upgraded” facility, a/c, security, power, etc.

Back then we had an entire class C /24 address space of public IP addresses, someone wanted to run their own email server, web server, etc., and need a public IP address, we provided that for a monthly cost, we setup a DNS server that hosted their records if necessary.

That’s why I was curious what AWS wasn’t charging up until for that service.


8 posted on 08/01/2023 1:41:59 PM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

This is the case. There is still a shit-ton of apps and hardware that don’t know what to do with IPV6 addressing schemes.


9 posted on 08/01/2023 1:49:15 PM PDT by Noumenon (You're not voting your way out of this. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel; glorgau

I worked for GE in the late 90s, and they had a class A. I wonder if they kept it, or monetized it? I bet the latter.


10 posted on 08/01/2023 1:51:40 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

Not to mention network engineers.


11 posted on 08/01/2023 1:52:17 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

True dat.


12 posted on 08/01/2023 1:56:46 PM PDT by Noumenon (You're not voting your way out of this. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
The infrastructure for IPv6 remains largely incomplete. Security software that covers IPv6 is also behind the curve.

Exactly.

13 posted on 08/01/2023 2:22:14 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
We really should all be on IPv6 by now. The company I work for has no plans for this at all.

Of course, the allocation of IPv6 was insanely sloppy and wasteful. I think I have the equivalent of almost the entire internet allocated to my house.

14 posted on 08/01/2023 3:43:51 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
I spun up on IPv6 shortly after its release. DoD was "mandating" it. I did a fair number of conversions of applications to handle a "dual stack IPv4/IPv6" properly. The hangup has always been the network routers and bridges. Just because your local equipment and apps are IPv6 capable doesn't mean the rest of the network can carry the traffic. There are also a multitude of new attack surfaces that security software needs to detect and block attacks. It's not hard to use IPv6 on a local network in place of typical class C e.g. 192.XXX.XXX.NNN patterns.
15 posted on 08/01/2023 6:05:53 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson