I think that meeting the EPA requirements is not the goal. I think the goal to to have requirements that cannot be met to justify the government takeover of energy production so the government can gain the might wielded by the rationing body. The left has always wanted to control the means of production.
How do you hold a president accountable when fraud is how they get elected?
But, except for Sweden, nary a peep.
Ergo, one must assume the climate problem isn't as serious as claimed and is just a means to advance a political agenda.
I still don’t understand how the EPA (or any federal agency) can just go ahead and make sweeping rules without the approval of Congress.
I think the Constitution should mean something. Maybe that’s my problem.
EPA’s New Power Plant Rule is another example of the EPA giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States.
Green Advocates are planning for you to lower your standard of living in order to meet their goals of lowering carbon emissions.
And then we go dark. Break out candles, kerosene lanterns and pot belly stoves. It is the 1800s all over again.
Great article offering a reality check against fanciful dreams of a professional politician with little or no repercussions for outcomes.
A simpleton (e.g., Biden) delivers edicts. A leader delivers challenges and opportunity for reward.
This stuff just torques me off. It's just like the BATF&E making "rules" on pistol braces, bump stocks, binary triggers and now private sales.
When will the congress-critters stand up and (somehow) stop the trespass on their authority to make laws by agencies that do not (should not, anyway) have that authority?
And just like the BATF&E, these rule comment periods are just placatory to make the us peons think we have an opinion. They don't care what comes in during the comment period - they're going to do what they want, and (so far) no one is going to stop them.
All arguments against epa are irrelevant to epa.
The only way to deal with epa is to end epa.