[DugwayDuke]

Olog-hai wrote: “In other words, you refused to answer me. What I “got” instead of my “answer” was two logical fallacies. Perhaps I request a logical answer in vain?”

Perhaps you should recognize that not believing in the anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult narrative is a valid answer. It isn’t a personal attack, a false dilemma, or any other type of logical fallacy.

[Olog-hai]

No; it is argumentum ad hominem. Saying something is a vaccine merely because a group of people say it is something else does not make it a vaccine.

Not to mention you having hijacked the thread to express bile at the object of your spite, whuch is the red herring fallacy. Conservatives champion logic while liberals eschew it.