[Boogieman]

“lateral movement might have indicated that, the anti-gravity existed towards the sides”

Then it wouldn’t be anti-gravity. Some other force perhaps, but not anti-gravity, since anti-gravity would show a repulsion opposite the center of all the mass in the local area (the center of the earth).

“you demonstrated that you can’t detect sarcasm”

When people in all seriousness post complete ignorance on science threads, it’s often impossible to detect sarcastic posts.

[adorno]

When people in all seriousness post complete ignorance on science threads, it’s often impossible to detect sarcastic posts.

Apparently, you don't have the capacity to determine the difference between humor and ignorance, which then makes you the ignorant one.

Still, it's very presumptuous for scientists to believe that anti-gravity is either an up or down force. It could be a sideways force movement. ;) Which way is up? In the universe, who knows?

Here's a question for you, Mr. Science: Which came first, the material part of the universe, or gravity? And, where does gravity come from/ Mass? Or is it an independent force?

[Ultra Sonic 007]

When people in all seriousness post complete ignorance on science threads, it’s often impossible to detect sarcastic posts.

It would be sort of like debating Flat Earthers: nigh impossible to tell which ones are trolling you or which ones actually believe it, because part of you is always thinking 'they can't REALLY be that stupid or ignorant, can they?'.