Did you pick up the Process 1 & Process 2 issue? Dr. Rose got into it.
From:
Report 86: Pfizer’s Clinical Trial ‘Process 2’ COVID Vaccine Recipients Suffered 2.4X the Adverse Events of Placebo Recipients; ‘Process 2’ Vials Were Contaminated with DNA Plasmids.
https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-process-2-vaccine-had-2-4-times-adverse-events/
What is Process 2, and why all the fuss?
The terms ‘Process 1’ and ‘Process 2’ were mentioned by Pfizer in the different iterations of the clinical trial protocol for this novel drug platform that would be used worldwide. The ‘process’ refers to the way the ‘vaccine’ was manufactured.
The original manufacturing process of BNT162b2, Pfizer’s COVID ‘vaccine,’ for the clinical trial used a messenger RNA duplication (amplification) technique known as PCR (polymerase chain reaction) — essentially like a photocopier, multiplying/cloning the original mRNA. This is known as ‘Process 1’.
*** Pay special attention to THIS NEXT paragraph ****
Commercially, this type of process is expensive and would have to be significantly ramped up to provide doses for the whole world. The commercial scaling of the product used a proven way of mass production using e. coli bacteria. This mass production technique is ‘Process 2’. The thorny issue was that ‘Process 2’ used a completely different manufacturing process than that used for the product in the clinical trial (Process 1), and the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the ‘vaccine’ was granted based on Process 1. Moreover, Process 2 was not compliant with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). Note the FOIAed national contracts with Pfizer from South Africa and Albania.
Revelations from gene sequencing of the residual product in the vials produced using Process 2 by Kevin McKernan, confirm other groups’ reporting of the determination that there is marked contamination of the modified mRNA with high levels of DNA plasmid fragments.
******
Bottom line: the jabs that the public got were NOT the ones submitted to the FDA for EUA approval - totally different process. Those in the ‘trial’ for Process 2 did not sign up for what they got. That being said, then we start getting into the Process 2 DNA contamination issues, E.coli endotoxin, SV40 enhancer that is oncogenic and did not need to be in the shots, so were intentially included .... and on & on the horror show goes.
Yes, I missed Dr. Rose's Process 1 & Process 2 issue
Continuing your post:
"Bottom line: the jabs that the public got were NOT the ones submitted to the FDA for EUA approval - totally different process
. ..then we start getting into the Process 2 DNA contamination issues , E.coli endotoxin, SV40 enhancer that is oncogenic and did not need to be in the shots,
so were intentially included .... and on & on the horror show goes."
Then this is also an INTENTIONAL case of criminal "bait and switch" on the general public,
as well as a criminal corporate Big Pharma fraud.
If so, then bring on the "Nuremberg Code" trials in the Hague.