REPORT: Donald Trump reportedly pulled out a piece of paper from his suit jacket in court, claiming it would clear him of all wrongdoing in the $250M fraud case.
Left-wing Judge Arthur Engoron refused to let him read it.
The paper in question reportedly was a disclaimer clause relating to a financial statement that AG Letitia James is using to go after him.
“I would love to read this, Your Honor, if I could?” Trump reportedly asked the judge.
“Not at this point, not at this point,” Engoron replied.
“I’m shocked,” Trump shot back.
The disclaimer clause, according to Trump, meant that he wasn’t liable for any inaccuracies on the documents.
“I think that the statements of financial conditions were very good, were actually somewhat conservative, and they were totally protected, and so was I, by the disclaimer clause,” Trump argued.
Kangaroo Court
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1721684561443299729?t=oGZ6WHNB9v5uij2txHGXow&s=09
“I would love to read this, Your Honor, if I could?” Trump reportedly asked the judge.”
Why did his lawyer not have it presented as evidence? Isn’t that usual procedure?