Posted on 12/27/2023 7:43:31 PM PST by logi_cal869
Another aspect not discussed in nearly any media analysis is western/US intelligence assistance to the ukes for targeting, or the effectiveness of Russian countermeasures against uke drones/cruise missiles.
///////
the way I hear of missle successes in crimea is that the ukes divert rus attention with one set of missles and then hit them from another angle so they can’t react.
so the rus do have adequate anti missle technology. but it can be overwhelmed, incapacitated, or diverted. that’s what it looks like happens with the successful crimea attacks.
but the ukes lately have stripped the rus of air cover for their front line troops. I think that’s biggest story.
Once the ukes take out the jammers—then they have free range for the drones over head while uke troops move forward below.
heck they might even be able to put a pontoon bridge over the dneiper.
You are a foolish reactionary.
You have conceded that you love Al gore and John Kerry.
You apparently also oppose Trump.
That’s a shame.
Do you have a slightest understanding of how air defenses work? What do you think is going to happen if someone strikes the US fleet in Hawaii with cruise missiles? The Russian defenses at least intercept 9 out of 10 attacks.
Not sure your point , based on Ukrainian results against much greater in number air defense assets , Ukrainians have had pretty good success.
Considering the attacks on US naval ships and 100% intercept rate, limited western air defense assets in Ukraine, with short response time pretty good intercept rate, and much longer reaction time pearl would have.
Would say attack on pearl would not be successful
But if your point is Russian air defense doing well, sure/s
“ fetish moron” lol
Conflating all those accusations together is stronk argument
Where the idea of 100% intercept rate comes from?
The “idea of 100% intercept” comes from navy shooting down 100% of missles it engaged in Red Sea
Do you understand the difference in both quality and quantity of the missiles in both cases? Also 100% interception is a BS because the ships get hit.
You are not very good at argumentation.
Human freedom
Diversity
666
Gog usa
Magog nato
Rev 13
Vindman is a jacobin leftist radical.
He was trying to undermine Trump’s hardline against Russia.
That is not difficult to understand. Vindman did not want Trump to expose Hunter Biden’s son to prosecution in Ukraine which was what Trump was asking Ukraine about in the phone call for which he was impeached.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.