Posted on 02/19/2024 8:22:36 AM PST by hardspunned
Unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, have been central to the war in Ukraine. Some analysts claim that drones have reshaped war, yielding not just tactical-level effects, but shaping operational and strategic outcomes as well.
It’s important to distinguish between these different levels of war. The tactical level of war refers to battlefield actions, such as patrols or raids. The operational level of war characterizes a military’s synchronization of tactical actions to achieve broader military objectives, such as destroying components of an adversary’s army. The strategic level of war relates to the way these military objectives combine to secure political aims, especially ending a war.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconversation.com ...
They sent 30 Abrams but I don’t know if they sent the 60 fuel trucks they would need and the massive maintenance support.
Guide To Ukraine’s Long Range Attack Drones
Mon 19 February 2024
By H I Sutton
http://www.hisutton.com/Ukraine-OWA-UAVs.html
First Sighting Of British Banshee Jet-Powered Drone In Ukraine
Mon 19 February 2024
By H I Sutton
http://www.hisutton.com/Ukraine-Banshee-Drone.html
I suspect this LTC’s analytical prowess on drone warfare is not going to age well, despite his BS from Westpoint, 4 Master’s Degrees and PhD in the works.
The smell of bull feces….
Because drone warfare is in its infancy. FPV drones used in the Ukraine are not swarms of 1,000 or more AI controlled drones attacking simultaneously.
U.S. military says it struck a Houthi underwater drone for first time
https://www.axios.com/2024/02/19/us-houthi-strike-underwater-drone-red-sea
I heard a Russian claim that during the Avdiivka assault they encountered an automated machine gun nest.
In a fixed position, it seems absurd anyone would do otherwise.
Close to the battle lines I would think laser RC mortar shells would be the way to go.
Lots of Ruzzians are dead because of Ukrainian drones.
That’s a wonderful outcome!
Quonset hut shape shells big enough to hide a person might be placed at front lines.
They can probably be made for less than the cost of a deadly drone and each one carried by four persons or on trucks.
Small drones might circle overhead to spot incoming deadly drones which could be shot down by automated guns.
98.6 degree water dummies are possible
key future techniques:
open framing - to make hitting harder and blasts less effective
redundancy - for cheaper manufacture, survivability and quick repair
dummies - to waste enemy firepower
We need a “skynet” over the entire battlefield. Then we could link it with robotic fighters. What could go wrong?
Until the gun jams or suffers a similar mishap...
Matryoshka concept shell-in-shell combat dress dummies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka_doll
Front line machinegun nests do not have long lifespans.
There are several ways to mitigate those problems.
“robotic fighters”
A command & control system (CCS) could be used to set a battle plan.
Each unit would have its own “robotic fighters” and the unit and its “robotic fighters” would be CCS area limited.
If a unit doesn’t advance too fast or in an unauthorized area it would be safe.
This is for discussion purposes. I do not advocate for the deployment of such a system. I do advocate for an armistice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.