[Fester Chugabrew]

I in no way want to challenge you on that, but politely request you post the pertinent text here so we can review it and thank you for the same.

I have a separate Freepmail pointing to some code as well.

Here is the thing: HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY HAVE PEOPLE HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION WHO ADVOCATE THE WHOLESALE SLAUGHTER OF OUR CITIZENS?

Not sorry for the shouting.

[jonascord]

US Constitution
Art. 6

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Not that it means a tinker's fart to a dim. Witness how they take an oath before they testify to Congress, and then blandly lie and dodge when questioned and quoted.

[Olog-hai]

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

That’s the text of Article 6, paragraph 3 (not designated a section FWICS). As you can see, everyone listed here (the word “executive” looks to me to include the POTUS and state governors and their respective officers) is “bound by oath or affirmation” et cetera.

FWICS, there are several federal laws that deal with violation of oaths of office, since for starters the oathbreaker is guilty of perjury, and of course other crimes; not to mention fighting against the Constitution is equivalent to making war against the USA per Article 3 Section 3.