Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

That is a truly pertinent quote. Thanks for posting it.

What’s your sense of this thing?

Mine is one of frustration that we cannot prosecute violations of oath when the characters involved advocate for anarchy and abortion, both of which directly contradict the meaning and intent of the very Constitution they “swear” to uphold and defend (as they wipe thier butts with it.)


49 posted on 02/26/2024 7:54:29 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (In a world of parrots and lemmings, be a watchdog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
Mine is one of frustration that we cannot prosecute violations of oath...

It's a devilish problem. Who brings the charge? Who makes the arrest? Who manages punishment? How is "Who" selected without those officers becoming beholden to the District of the Craven?

This is where the 17th Amendment shows to be an evil. If Senators represented their States, the States could get them to file charges. It would take an Amendment, but let's say a third of the States were up for leveling charges, then that would require an Impeachment vote in the House, which effectively puts a two year time limit on a dangerous President. Tragically, as things are now per the 17th, Senators effectively represent DC because they are so beholden to mass media.

See tag line.

65 posted on 02/26/2024 9:38:05 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson