Posted on 03/10/2024 9:13:59 AM PDT by Chode
For decades, the US Navy has been the world's most powerful ocean going force. It operates some of the most successful warship designs in recent history.
It also operates some with more...complex...stories.
In this episode we look at US efforts to develop a new generation of surface warships, including the LCS and Zumwalt Destroyers, and ask both what went wrong with these incredibly expensive projects and what we might be able to learn from them.
Take that Putin, we don’t need no Navy ships because WE ARE AMERICA and therefore WE ARE INVINCIBLE!!!!
As long as they’re diverse and get pronouns right, doesn’t really matter, does it? /s
I had a project that was killed by putting it on the Littoral combat ship. Our sled, a mine sweeper, had to be towed by the largest helicopter. Towing it with the small copter on the littoral combat ship was very, very dangerous. the connecting cable which was a zero profit item, cost $50,000. Every time the sled hit a wave, the copter pilot would hit the emergency disconnect, which guillotined the cable. Pretty soon, we’d run the entire project out of budget. Something we warned the navy about, and which everyone involved understood. But the admiral in charge wanted to put every mission under the sun on this crappy little boat that couldn’t do the jobs they wanted. So, count in fifty-four million dollars lost because of this and it won’t be in the totals. Put it under “other.”
perfect...
I was once stationed on the USS Coral Sea (CV-43) that had real armor. Got tours aboard the littoral ships and was struck by the complete lack of armor. A 50 cal would likely go in one side and out the other. These ships were never made for any level of combat.
Roger that. My first ship was a DE built-in ‘54. May have had more armor but likely not. đđ
OK, discuss: Provide examples of an overly literal combat ship.
Yours is an interesting postâŠI bet people on FR see this at work often. That is, leadership that doesnât listen to engineers and other employees who try telling them what will and wonât work.
Sometimes the leadership problem is incompetence but often itâs arrogance.
Buoyancy isn't a function of diversity and right pronouns.
The small ship-board chopper did not have the power to tow the sled— and they ignored this in the quest for more “capabilities” to be lumped on the new littoral warfare ships....
costing 54 million in the failure. Wow. And that figure in pentagonese is chump change.
“Sometimes the leadership problem is incompetence but often itâs arrogance.”
Ignorance, incompetence, and arrogance go hand in hand. Arrogance is generally a cover for ignorance and incompetence. This is not limited to government. There is an alarming lack of true leadereship and even basic competence in all levels of government AND commercial enterprise. Here is a minor case in point. I was in a large home improvement box store (brand L) a few months ago. I was attempting to purchase a roll around tool chest. I was told that the only person in the whole place who could operate a fork lift to get the thing down off the shelf was in a meeting. Huh? It eventually took over 2 hours to give the store money. A chat with the boss was more important to them than a $450.00 sale. At all levels of government and commerce incompetence and arrogance are the norm these days. The customer/citizen is always wrong.
Probably a DEI training meeting. Yes, that is more important in the modern whiz-bang corporate world then a $450 sale!
I agree with what youâre saying.
On the flip side a good leader can make all the difference in the world.
The only reason I and hundreds of employees have jobs is because the company hired one marketing director who changed everything.
We almost went under in 2008, but he came in, turned things around and grew the company into a market leader.
When I drive by Bremerton Naval ship yard, I see two of these berthed there in moth balls, sitting rusting.
cryin shame...
More like the admiral decided his retirement plan depended on the LCS’s supplier staying happy.
It’s not stupidity, it’s corruption.
The dirty secret? A litoral âcombatâ ship doesnât have anywhere near the capability of just a Fletcher class destroyer. And it canât come any closer to the shore. Most embarrassingly, it would likely be unable to survive a duel with a single T-72 tank sitting on the shore.
That would be a 2 inch gun going up against a 5 inch gun. With zero armor, accrue much too small to do damage control. Hell, the thing doesnât even have a paint locker.
The navy got jealous of the air force and all the gee-whiz stuff they kept tacking onto every new airplane?
Hey, let’s do with ships what the Germans do with BMWs, more and more electrical crap to fail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.