Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
> I don’t agree with him, but he should have the right to make his speech.

If you mean the Muslim who was to give the address, it's a HER not a HIM.

And she must have made some mighty fiery statements on social media to lose this opportunity to rabble-rouse 65,000 listeners. All that talk of "safety" -- she probably was calling for genocide of the Jews.

4 posted on 04/16/2024 10:10:38 PM PDT by dayglored (Strange Women Lying In Ponds Distributing Swords! Arthur Pendragon in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored

She posted a link to a site calling for the abolishment of Israel


9 posted on 04/16/2024 10:39:31 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Unless they had evidence she was going to do that at the speech...then this is a 1st amendment issue. If you don’t get to do things in the future because GOVERNMENT decided what you said in the past is not good then the 1st amendment means nothing.


19 posted on 04/16/2024 11:31:13 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson