[woodbutcher1963]

This “story” might be interesting IF there was not so much DNA blood evidence in OJ’s vehicle. Did the mobster borrow OJ’s car and leave the blood in his car? Then plant the bloody glove outside his house. Then flee the scene driving OJ’s vehicle(there was a witness to this that sold her story).

[Kharis13]

This “story” might be interesting IF there was not so much DNA blood evidence in OJ’s vehicle. Did the mobster borrow OJ’s car and leave the blood in his car? Then plant the bloody glove outside his house. Then flee the scene driving OJ’s vehicle(there was a witness to this that sold her story).

Your last comment about the witness seeing O.J. driving away from (near) the scene of the murders is something I've always wondered about. She sold her story for something like $5k, but her testimony could've been very helpful to the prosecution. It's too bad she couldn't see the long game.

[OldGoatCPO]

Allan Dershowitz pointed out that all the blood evidence was considered tainted after they discovered Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in the blood samples from the socks. Forensic teams use that chemical to prevent coagulation of the blood sample. That indicated tampering or contamination. It made all of the blood samples seem tainted to the jurors.

The prosecution thought they had a slam dunk case and were wetting themselves at the prospect of putting OJ Simpson in prison for life. Everyone forgets what idiots the detectives and prosecution were. They blamed the judge and OJ's team, but the racist recording of the detective sealed the deal with the black jurors.

Was he guilty? Probably? His past injuries and arthritis make me think he had a younger accomplice, but we will never know for sure. This story is BS someone getting 15 minutes of fame.