Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: weikel
If one state legalized it would be temporaraly worse as the addicts moved there but then it would get better after they died.

Unfortunatly not all of em die. They just linger. It's like they are immune to OD. It would remain a state with streets full of addicts until they reprohibit hard substances.

49 posted on 03/21/2002 7:26:33 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Texaggie79
Oh well if the cause trouble they'll be arrested for something besides drugs if they don't then who cares.
50 posted on 03/21/2002 8:18:20 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Texaggie79; weikel
weikel says:

"If one state legalized it would be temporaraly worse as the addicts moved there but then it would get better after they died."

Unfortunatly not all of em die. They just linger. It's like they are immune to OD. It would remain a state with streets full of addicts until they reprohibit hard substances. -ta-

Common sense from weikel and more sophomoric speculation from the aggister.

Out of control substance abusers, - 'addicts', - when faced with a shortage of their 'drug of choice', simply move on to another substance.

It's common sense that we can regulate public use of such addictive substances, but we can't prohibit an endless list of them, - and still live in a free republic.

Obsessive prohibitionists cannot understand such simple truths. - They have compulsions, - that in many ways mimic addictions.

65 posted on 03/21/2002 9:35:40 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson