To: John Jamieson
Dusek will be given an opportunity to "explain" a scenario. His scenario will be based on his selection of the evidence and testimony that was provided to the jury.
I believe he has drawn out sufficent testimony from all the bug guys that will allow him to demonstrate that the bug science is not absolute, that the bug guys established only minimum times and that no one can know how long she was there.
To: VRWC_minion
The bugguys established both minimum and maximum times between the body being found and the first ova position. The minimum time was 4 days (23d to 27th), and the maximum time was 18 days (9th to 27th). Dusek tried to confuse the issue by calling both minimums. I guess he made sense to you, but not to most of us.
To: VRWC_minion
I know that you favor the prosecution and you choose to interpret the testimony to suit your opinion. We all do the same, but...........
It cannot be denied that if the dates and calculations remained exactly as they are but the prosecution desired the later dates, Dusek would be perfectly content with the findings.
If you think not, you are really kidding yourself.
To: VRWC_minion
I believe he has drawn out sufficent testimony from all the bug guys that will allow him to demonstrate that the bug science is not absolute, that the bug guys established only minimum times and that no one can know how long she was there.
Dusek may succeed in polluting the BUG eggspurts...but he will not be able to deny the potential culpability of the SWING SET 6...and the self admitted HARD CORE swinging of the VD's and their gal pals....
You would agree??
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson