Replies

I been studying the bugmen's calculations, comparing one with another. As we progressed from one to another each took into consideration MORE possible temperature sets, MORE experimental tests results from MORE researches and became MORE conservative in using the magot mass corrections. Each time the range of possible egg deposition became a little wider.

Making the corrections for Goff's minor math errors, makes little difference in his conclusions. Each man tried to do a better job of widening the interval to see if the prosecution's theory of the crime could work, and yet all concluded that it COULD NOT.

I think ALL were intellicually honest and each felt a serious need to do the job right. My hat's off to them for their hard work and clear thinking. Anyone of them that could have made Dusek's case would have a job testifing for the prosecution for the rest of their lives. They applied the science as best it could be done and all came to the same conclusion. DW couldn't have done it alone.

>>>They applied the science as best it could be done and all came to the same conclusion. DW couldn't have done it alone.<<<

That's not the case at all. 3 of 7 say the bug infestation could have started before Feb 4. And the others explained how certain variables could have "skewed" their results in whatever way. If any of these jurors put any weight into this easily skewed science in deciding if Westerfield fate ONE WAY OR THE OTHER I'd say their minds are easily skewed.