The "child rape porno" evidence was reviewed by a computer forensic expert. He has testified it was a deleted file. That means NOBODY was collecting it.
Sorry but I think you are not aware of the evidence. The illegal porno was on zip disks and CD's, that means someone put in on deliberatly. Do you think DW is a scumbag for trying to blame his son for the child rape porno?
http://video.uniontrib.com/news/metro/danielle/transcripts/20020604-9999-pm2.html
EXCERPTS FROM FELDMAN'S OPENING
snip
THEY HAD SEIZED HIS COMPUTERS. YOU SAW A COUPLE OF PICTURES OF NAKED GIRLS.
Snip
IN EACH OF THOSE PICTURES, NOT THE SIX SMALL
16 CHILDREN THAT YOU WERE SHOWN ON DIRECT, THEY'RE THERE, NO ISSUE.
17 BUT THE 1700 OR 1800 OTHER PHOTOS IN ANOTHER NOTEBOOK, AND A
18 NUMBER OF MPEGS, OKAY. WHAT MR. DUSEK REFERRED TO IS WHAT HE
19 CALLED "MEN FORCING THEMSELVES ON YOUNG GIRLS," OKAY,
(my notes:This is admitting they will see them..that's why he's attempting to show that dw did not download them)