He should still sue San Diego up the wazoo for conducting an illegal fishing expedition into his affairs just because he happened to live near where a crime happened.
They had no evidence of motive, and they took advantage of his good nature and willingness to help solve this high profile case.
I would agree with you on this.
People's emotions being what they are and from the description we heard of the video clip and some of the jurors reactions I wonder.
I guess we don't have too much longer to go to find out what the answer will be though. I think the closing arguments are going to be rather colorful.