Do not think for one second, as you have tried to imply, that some of us trial watchers are making light of the child porn. For the millionth time..we deploy child porn. How many times do we have to print it out..how many, Kim?
If YOU think that DW should be put to death, because of it...and that would be the State's case against him, the child porn..then it is between you and your conscience.
Not ONE Forensic psychiatrist would dare testify that it was a Motive, or an indicator. NOT ONE.
That's all I'm going to say, without losing it, Kim.
sw
??? Is that child porn dressed in BDUs ???
I think desperate people can't recognize other desperate people.
I've been thinking about the trial throughout the weekend. It dawned on me, that the State will ask the jury to convict a man and sentence him to death for a crime that, itself, has not been proven.
There is absolutely not a sliver of evidence/proof that Danielle was abducted from her home.
There is absolutely not a sliver of evidence/proof that Danielle was raped.
There is absolutely not a sliver of evidence/proof that Danielle was murdered (being deceased does not equal murder). No cause of death has ever been established.
Thus, accept for possession of child porn, David Westerfield is on trial for a needs-to-be-elected DA's assumption of certain facts.
I hear the FBI did that recently. Seriously, I think you meant "deplore."
How many times do we have to print it out
Just once will get you locked up. First you're deploying it, then your printing it out, next you'll be hanging it on the wall!
Maybe Kim is right about DW supporters! (j/k, of course)