To: wardaddy
The Union was never really successful in the East till Sherman destroyed all their supplies in the West( though I think Hooker's plan would have worked if he had a more competent colleague then Burnside) I think Forest was more useful to the South where he was( no Im not a neoconfederate I just like military history).
11 posted on
10/06/2002 11:12:03 PM PDT by
weikel
To: weikel
The Union was never really successful in the East... The Union wasn't as successful in the East as they could have been until Grant came out to command. After that, the writing was on the wall.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson