Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
The Harriet Lane fired a single shot over 12 hours before the bombardment, and 24 hours after Davis had given the order to take the fort, and you claim it initiated hostilities. On that basis one could just as easily claim that the hostilities were actually intitiated several months prior when the south fired on the Star of the West.
918 posted on 11/19/2002 3:41:33 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
The Harriet Lane fired a single shot over 12 hours before the bombardment, and 24 hours after Davis had given the order to take the fort, and you claim it initiated hostilities.

It was the first physical shot of the war in the proximity of the war and directly related to the event that initiated the war, so yes. It initiated the hostilities of physical warfare.

On that basis one could just as easily claim that the hostilities were actually intitiated several months prior when the south fired on the Star of the West.

One could probably find any number of isolated firings, skirmishes, and other pre-war events by either side. But none has the proximity to the war that the Harriet Lane did. For all practical purposes it was the first shot of the war.

956 posted on 11/19/2002 10:42:24 AM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson