Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: countess
Did I say I never put on Court TV channel in my life?

As the post I made clearly states, I put it on that day "out of curiosity" and they weren't even showing the courtroom. That means that I wasn't a regular viewer. That continues to this day. Instead of proving my a liar, you have proven my point.

demsux was saying that "we" are regular viewers and take our talking points from Court TV, which is as wrong as can be.

Understand now? (I won't hold my breath)

1,237 posted on 01/24/2003 9:12:58 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1229 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
Oh, brother. It looks like you watch enough to get irritated by the commercials. How do you know their coverage is "awful" if you don't watch regularly?




Bugs: The Best Witnesses? (Westerfield's Son Neal Forced To Testify By Desperate D.A. Dusek!!)

Posted by cyncooper to is_is
On News/Activism 07/26/2002 3:54 PM EDT #1,322 of 1,500

CTV taking commercial breaks, etc....
Can you believe the way they cut away? It makes it hardly watchable.

I try to get the streaming video and if that fails have been doing audio. Really! I do agree CourtTV coverage is awful. Sometimes I do try to catch Beth Karas during breaks because she can tell us what she observed in the courtroom (albeit we must all be skeptical of media).





Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1,317 | View Replies
1,243 posted on 01/24/2003 9:25:03 AM PST by countess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson