[PrairieDawg]

One quick question for you:

If the bug evidence is now discredited as a forensic tool, why aren't all those in jail because of bug evidence released immediately?

Or were all the bug guys only wrong on this case?

Just wonderin...

FRegards,
PrairieDawg

[cyncooper]

If the bug evidence is now discredited as a forensic tool,

I don't think bug evidence is thoroughly discredited, per se. It was conceded by the experts that it is not exact and the observations made in this case indicated an atypical situation, per testimony.

why aren't all those in jail because of bug evidence released immediately?

Please present a case where a defendent was convicted solely on bug evidence.

[Freedom2specul8]

There is a difference in this case...wrt:bugs..her body was dehydrated.. there was no fluid beneath her body...her skin was black and leathery. So, if there are other cases, with similar facts than I would definitely ask someone to look into it. If the body decomposed normally, as normal as possible anyway...than my answer would be no..it would not be necessary to lookin to them.