Nonsense. "Darwinists" will be persuaded by facts, evidence, theories which fit the known data, and reasoned arguments. But twaddle like the straw-man essay which starts this thread don't fit any of those categories.
Perhaps, as long as it supports their preconceived notions.
Really? Let's see the contributions of the evolutionists to this thread (names withheld to protect the guilty):
Bilge for your mill. - post# 5
It doesn't matter whether or not evolution is true, it must be suppressed "for the good of the children." - post# 6
I almost started to debate this, until I realized that honest debate has nothing to do with your post...- post# 7
Oh slay he the mighty strawman! - post# 9
This whole article stinks, - post# 10
I just took from the first ten posts, did not want to bore all with the same old rhetorical, insulting garbage which the evolutionists try to pass off as argument on these threads.
If evolutionists were really scientists, and believed in science, and were informed about the facts of evolution, they would eagerly refute the statements of opponents with scientific facts and hard evidence. But they are not, they are just a bunch of atheist buffoons.