You are projecting. Did my words move you? They are nothing but the truth. (Or maybe this could be a cynical attempt to avoid addressing a glaring inconsistency in your argument? Nah, couldn't be - I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.)
I posted several times [once with a link] in plain English what I think the word 'murder' means.
I did not "redefine words at will".
You only avoided "redefining words at will" by refusing to state any definition whatsoever. I was referred first to the politicized Supreme Court; and then to a law library, whose definition agreed with my own, but which you denied was so.
I knew from the start of the conversation that you would have to do that in order to maintain your position. I will note that you still have refused to put in your own words what you think 'murder' means. Thus, in order to demonstrate the fatal weakness of the abortion-is-a-freedom argument, I proved that 'murder' is something an abortion advocate can never define without admitting the wrongness of his position. The record of our now seven exchanges on the subject is testimony to this truth.
You appear to need rest.
Projecting again. I know your mind must need rest after being confronted with all these new ideas... feel free to pick this up again when you're up to it.