This is a human being: 
This is also a human being:
Accept it, even momentarily for the sake of argument, and consider the implications.
You are projecting. Did my words move you? They are nothing but the truth.
Yes of course.. Your words ~must~ be truth, and mine lies..
(Or maybe this could be a cynical attempt to avoid addressing a glaring inconsistency in your argument?
What inconsistency? Post it..
Nah, couldn't be - I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.)
Whatever.
******************************
I posted several times [once with a link] in plain English what I think the word 'murder' means.
I did not "redefine words at will".
You only avoided "redefining words at will" by refusing to state any definition whatsoever.
Simply not true. You're getting overwrought.
I was referred first to the politicized Supreme Court; and then to a law library, whose definition agreed with my own, but which you denied was so. I knew from the start of the conversation that you would have to do that in order to maintain your position. I will note that you still have refused to put in your own words what you think 'murder' means.
And I will continue to defy your increasingly weird demands that I ~obey~ you in this inane non-issue..
Thus, in order to demonstrate the fatal weakness of the abortion-is-a-freedom argument, I proved that 'murder' is something an abortion advocate can never define without admitting the wrongness of his position.
Dream on. You've proved nothing, and displayed some pretty bizarre behaviour.
The record of our now seven exchanges on the subject is testimony to this truth.
Now its eight. -Get a grip.
**************************
You appear to need rest.
Projecting again. I know your mind must need rest after being confronted with all these new ideas... feel free to pick this up again when you're up to it.
New idea? What new idea?
This is a human being:
This is also a human being:
Accept it, even momentarily for the sake of argument, and consider the implications.