Replies

First of all, I'm a "single issue" guy. Yeah, I'm personally pro-life, but if a candidate is pro choice and pro-gun and has the track record to prove it like Zell Miller, then he's got my vote. Because talk is cheap. Anybody can claim to be pro-gun because they were raised around guns. Clinton was raised around guns, so were a lot of anti-gun whackos. Heck, Kerry went bird hunting a few weekends ago. So what? How do you know Zell is pro CFR? He's not a member of that group. Unless you're referring to campaign finance reform and not the Council on Foreign Relations?

>> First of all, I'm a "single issue" guy. Yeah, I'm personally pro-life, but if a candidate is pro choice and pro-gun and has the track record to prove it like Zell Miller, then he's got my vote. Because talk is cheap. Anybody can claim to be pro-gun because they were raised around guns. Clinton was raised around guns, so were a lot of anti-gun whackos. Heck, Kerry went bird hunting a few weekends ago. So what? How do you know Zell is pro CFR? He's not a member of that group. Unless you're referring to campaign finance reform <<

Yep, that would be campaign finance reform. Zig Zag has ALWAYS been in the McCain-Feingold corner and he's called a "conservative" Democrat, meanwhile I have a Republican Senator about twice as conservative as Zig Zag (85% conservative rating last year vs. Zig Zag's 47%) but he's called a "RINO" because he voted for it ONCE. If you're so ardently single-issue, I take it Howard Dean is your boy for 2004. After all, he's 99% socialist on the rest of the issues, but he has a "A" rating from gun groups. If that means your bar of "acceptablity", any further discussion with you is useless. It will, however, be cute when Howard flip-flops on the national level and bans all guns. Anyone who votes for a Democrat gets what they paid for.