Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: jstolarczyk
It is IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!!!!!!! If Moore has the hubris to run, there will be still only be two candidates that will collect ALL the electoral votes, BUSH and KERRY.

The odds of Roy Moore winning are slightly less than getting struck by lightning the day I win the lottery. I know that. That is close to, but not the same as, impossible.

If your goal is to sabotage Bush...

My goal is to do what is right. I leave the outcome to God.

Only a fool would think his Christian view point and defense of the ten commandmants makes him qualified to fight a war and run this country.

Bush was elected in 2000 on little more than his Christian view point and being governor of Texas. In that respect, Moore is at least as qualified as Bush was then. Plus, he has demonstrated a willingness to sacrifice his own position for the good of the country. Bush had not done so prior to 9/11. If Moore does run, we will learn how is other positions measure up.

You will have less impact on Bush than the minuscule impact Nader will have on Kerry!

Even so, that is not the point. If elections are only about picking the winner, I would rather go to Vegas on election day and wager my life savings on the outcome. I would stand a much better chance of getting something I want.

19 posted on 02/24/2004 6:52:59 AM PST by David75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: David75
"My goal is to do what is right. I leave the outcome to God."
Muslims call thats "ENSHALLAH" (I am not sure on the spelling) it is used to mean whatever happens is Gods will. Which may be true, but God would not have given us a will or choices if we were not meant to use them. So enshallah has become an excuse for doing nothing.

George Bush had political experience that Roy Moore lacks. Moore's claim to fame is ignoring the rule of law, how is what Moore did different than what is happening in SF? God did not put the Ten Commandments in the court house, Moore did. Do I disapprove, no! Was it against the law, yes! I could care less what his opinions are, we all have those. HE COULD NOT AND WOULD NOT MAKE A GOOD COMMANDER IN CHIEF, HE HAS NO QUALIFICATIONS. Bush was elected to political office and had support of a national party. That is why he was elected. Was he prepared to be a Commander in Chief. More than likely not! But since 9-11 he has become a outstanding Commander in Chief. I do not want a untested, CinC whose only qualification is he broke the law for a good cause, to step into office in the middle of a war. What is "right" is subjective, bullets and bombs are not. Moore is an activist for a good cause, but Presidential he is not!
20 posted on 02/24/2004 7:58:41 AM PST by jstolarczyk (jstolarczyk : Bush could be the most successful one term president in history.. ..Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson