Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Tancredo Endorses AIP Candidate Jim Gilchrest Over Fellow Republicans In CA Special Election
Politics1.com ^ | September 29, 2005 | Ron Gunzburger

Posted on 09/29/2005 7:09:50 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

OPPOSING IMMIGRANTS ... AND REPUBLICANS. Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO) -- a 2008 White House hopeful and the leading Hill advocate of imposing a radical crackdown on immigration into the US -- broke with the GOP in the upcoming California special election for the congressional CD-48 seat recently vacated by SEC Chair Christopher Cox (R). Although ten of the 17 candidates -- including frontrunners State Senator John Campbell and former Assemblywoman Marilyn Brewer -- are Republicans, Tancredo formally endorsed an ideological ally. Tancredo endorsed American Independent Party nominee Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the "Minuteman Project" of citizen border patrols. "I need Jim Gilchrist with me in Congress. Together Jim and I can fight to stop illegal immigration," said Tancredo. Based upon the most recently filed campaign finance reports, Gilchrist has outraised any of the individual Dems in the race.

(Excerpt) Read more at politics1.com ...


TOPICS: California; Campaign News; U.S. Congress
KEYWORDS: 48th; bordersecurity; chriscox; gilchrist; huckabeein08; issa; jimgilchrest; jimgilchrist; minuteman; minutemenchriscox; politicalsuicide; specialelection; tontancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Torie

Your numbers are WAY off.

Jim Gilchrist kicked John Campbell's butt tonight on the John and Ken show.

We have the MO.


21 posted on 10/03/2005 8:08:02 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Put Principle Before Party. Support Minuteman Jim Gilchrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Well I heard most the debate standing in line (I think I may have seen you, but you had a baseball cap on, so I am not sure), and on the radio. In my fair and balanced opinion, Gilchrist lost, and Campbell defanged John and Ken, who got quite friendly with Campbell at the end, apparently unhappy with Gilchrist's performance, and reassured by Campbell's. But that is all neither here nor there. The KFI debate will have no impact on the numbers. Come on, be a sport, and post your numbers. Don't be coy. Just let it all hang out. If you don't want to do it publically, freepmail me. As you know, all freepmails to me are totally confidential, always.


22 posted on 10/03/2005 8:13:41 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Torie

There is far more going on in this race than the debate.

24 hours and you'll have the only numbers that matter.


23 posted on 10/04/2005 1:02:19 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Put Principle Before Party. Support Minuteman Jim Gilchrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Campbell did not win the debate.

The undecided voters in the room left supporting Gilchrist. I know that for a fact. I talked to most of them, and they left loaded down with Jim Gilchrist materials.


24 posted on 10/04/2005 1:38:35 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Put Principle Before Party. Support Minuteman Jim Gilchrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Campbell snuck into the room, and slunk out at the end.

Can't have him sullying himself talking to those lowly voters, after all.

/sarcasm


25 posted on 10/04/2005 1:44:24 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Put Principle Before Party. Support Minuteman Jim Gilchrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Torie

I've talked to thousands of 48th District voters.

I have yet to meet one that has even talked with John Campbell.

They aren't calling him 'Milk-Carton Campbell' for naught.


26 posted on 10/04/2005 1:48:37 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Put Principle Before Party. Support Minuteman Jim Gilchrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
They aren't calling him 'Milk-Carton Campbell' for naught.

Lol I hope Gilchrist can pull it off, we need him in Congress and on the Immigration Reform Caucus with Tancredo.

27 posted on 10/04/2005 6:38:55 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

The audiance was reflective of the listeners of the John and Ken Show, who tend to be Conservative Independents, and dislike the Republican Establishment and support Conservatives outside or on the outside fringe of the Republican Party, like Gilchrist. From the start of the debate, not only was John and Ken for Gilchrist, but they and the audiance were clearly cheering and unfairly routing for Gilchrist. I have listened to the debate, and the points at which Gilchrist attacked Campbell were mostly unsupported fabrications and exaggerations against him. As for policy discussion, Campbell was far more indepth into his beliefs, history and plans than Gilchrist, while Gilchrist seemed to just be riling the Partisan audiance, which he clearly packed with his own supporters. At times Campbell would state positions that were almost identical to Gilchrist's own, and the audiance would either say nothing or even boo, when had it been Gilchrist speaking they would have cheered and clapped. Campbell was a good sport, kept his cool, and I believe won the debate on what was said, nevertheless, however by the audiance reaction (which means nothing considering it was a partisan Gilchrist audiance) you might have thought Gilchrist won.


28 posted on 10/04/2005 4:32:28 PM PDT by MassachusettsGOP (Massachusetts Republican....A rare breed indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MassachusettsGOP
...however by the audiance reaction (which means nothing considering it was a partisan Gilchrist audiance) you might have thought Gilchrist won.

It certainly means 'something' when you consider the size of John and Ken's audience in the 48th District.

29 posted on 10/04/2005 4:39:42 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Put Principle Before Party. Support Minuteman Jim Gilchrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

There you might be right, but I just wish Gilchrist ran as a Republican, its very risky with a Republican and Gilchrist in the race in order to get a Conservative this way.


30 posted on 10/04/2005 7:07:40 PM PDT by MassachusettsGOP (Massachusetts Republican....A rare breed indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MassachusettsGOP; EternalVigilance

Very few voters showed up to vote today. Maybe close to 70% of the vote will be by absentee ballot. I am more confident of my numbers as a result. Brewer and Campbell had an active absentee ballot campaign, and apparently the rest did not. We should have the absentee count by maybe 9 pm. Without Brewer in the race, Campbell would have had this wrapped up tonight. If I am wrong, way wrong EV will quite enjoy that I'm sure. :)


31 posted on 10/04/2005 7:38:52 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Cap. will win in Nov . and now D. Issaa has asked the Pubs to boot Tancredo for being disloyal. Unfortunately, Tom is a one issue guy and while Jim Gil. is a good guy, he could not win in a solid Pub district. Better the Camp then Marilyn. That is jut reality. Of course, Tom will do well in Colo. next year but my guess is the Pubs will have to have some immigration agenda to run on or they will get their brains beat in with it by those wascally hypocritical Dems.


32 posted on 10/05/2005 7:10:32 PM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bboop

Simple solution - the Republicans get behind Tancredo in 2008 - party unity guaranteed!


33 posted on 10/10/2005 4:35:53 PM PDT by mobyss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MassachusettsGOP

I think John and Ken are spittle-frothing demagogues. I think demagoguery is always destructive. I cannot stand them.


34 posted on 10/14/2005 7:18:30 AM PDT by bboop (Facts are your friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson