[Seabee133]

I am personally for the nuclearization of the whole damn area. Give S. Korea and Japan nukes. Let Japan re-arm, drop the Missouri Treaty and let them build up their military and when they are ready shift defense of South East Asia over to them and South Korea. We need to get the hell out of that region anyways. They have profits to protect and they arent going to want to lose that. Secondly, you are myopic if you dont think they already have the capability to kill Americans. My point was that if we give them antiquated technology that we developed we will keep them behind us and we already know the ins and outs of that tech so it is easy to defend against. Thirdly, no I dont have any children in the Navy, I am active duty U.S. Navy. Look up “Seabee” on the net.

P.S. You need to address the whole post not just parts of the excerpts you choose. That is a very liberal tactic. Have you gone to the New York Times school on editorial interpretation?

[Designer]

"You need to address the whole post not just parts of the excerpts you choose."

Which whole area?

Yes, I realize the enemy can kill Americans without our help, but I do not see any p;oint in helping them improve their military with our own resources in order that they might be able to kill even more Americans.

You are displaying your own ignorance of the way our country has already helped the Chinese gain mightily in the area of space-based military capability.

The reason I asked about any children, is because I am attempting to help you understand the consequences of building a navy for our enemy. So why not think about your own chances for survival if the Chinese start shelling your ship? I will stop pestering you with logic if you still don't get it.

Furthermore, you do not gain credibility by condecending remarks you made such as "Look up “Seabee” on the net".

FYI: I did not recently fall off the turnip truck, and I already know what the "SeaBees" do.