Limbaugh on Ayers

10-12-08 | Tom Axtell

[jadedtom]

---

http://home.comcast.net/~thomasaxtell

[jadedtom]

Really appreciated Rush Limbaugh's comments Friday comparing Bill Ayers to Timothy McVeigh. As usual, Rush is spot on.

Ayers may have been thinking of McVeigh when he made the comment: "We could have done more." After all, Timothy managed to kill almost two hundred Americans. Ayers killed what, a two or three cops?

He's clearly an underachiever, which may be why he is allied with fellow underachiever Mr. Obama.

jadedtom

---

http://home.comcast.net/~thomasaxtell

[wintertime]

Re: Rush Limbaugh

Too little. Too late.

Ayers is a communist, and the communists in this nation have managed to take control of education, the media, the arts, all of our government bureaucracies, and are not fully entrenched in our legislatures.

In the meantime, Rush has consistently failed to identify the enemy. They are not “liberals”, “leftists”, “socialist”, or “progressives”!!! Yet, Rush for years on end has continued to use these false and friendly sounding names.

Marxism is our nation’s **most** serious threat!! And,...Rush has consistently failed to identify it or call it by name. He really is a big fat idiot!

[jadedtom]

Calm down wintertime...

You are getting lost in ‘isms’.

What makes you hate Limbaugh so?

You seem intelligent...get your own radio show and develop an audience. Seems like you’d be fun!

http://home.comcast.net/~thomasaxtell

[XHogPilot]

Re-forming Chicago schools into communist re-education facilities.

Ayers Is No Education 'Reformer'

[wintertime]

Rush **knows** that Marxism is our nation’s **most** serious threat yet has for YEARS has refuse to address this threat.

He has 20 million listeners and has squandered his opportunity for TWENTY years! I call that cowardly.

[jadedtom]

He was addressing Marxism on his show a couple of day ago.

You are still involved in ‘isms’...I don’t like Marxism, communism, socialism.

Like I said, you seem like you are a lot of fun and intelligent, start your own talk show and see how many people listen to you.

I think you are just jealous of Mr. Limbaugh. Get over yourself and get over Karl Marx while you are at it.

Tom

http://home.comcast.net/~thomasaxtell

[wintertime]

He was addressing Marxism on his show a couple of day ago.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Too little. Too late.

I see Rush Limbaugh as being the most powerful watchman on the talk radio watchtower. Maybe if he had **consistently** sounded the alarm about Marxism in our culture **years ago** we would not have had an Obama as a candidate today.

By the way I listened to all of Rush's Oct 13th program on MP3 today. He did not mention Marxism, communism, Stalin..etc. even once through that program.

How is it possible to discuss Obama without mentioning Marxism? Unbelievable! Everything Obama says and does is driven by Marxism.

[blake6900]

With all respect it seems to me you're going ape-sh!t simply because Limbaugh hasn't actually used the words Marxism, Stalinism, communism, etc. during the course of his radio career. So what? Those of us who listen to him on a daily basis know exactly what he means by the term liberal, that he is essentially calling them Marxists, socialists, etc. and that's why liberals hate the label "liberal".

Another example: Rush doesn't have to use the words "lying assho!e" to describe Barack Obama yet we all understand that that's exactly what he means.

We get it...why can't you?

[wintertime]

So what?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Conservatives are not the only people listening to Rush Limbaugh. Independents and liberals do as well. In fact in some areas for those who do not like NPR and music Rush is the only other alternative.

So...When Rush Limbaugh uses the term liberal or socialist, the uneducated think he means Norway...How threatening can that be? Huh? When he calls Venezuela's Chavez a “socialist” liberals, independents, the uneducated, and some conservatives think French socialism when, in fact,Chavez is a hard core Lenist-Stalinist communist.

Also,...The Berlin Wall fell in 1989. Anyone 35 or younger ( even 40 and younger) were teens, children, or very young college age students during the Cold War. There are vast numbers of listeners who need an education, and Rush has **consistently** failed to educate his listeners about what communism was, and the threat is is in our culture today.

It is to communism in it most repressive form that Marxists in our culture subscribe. It is not a Norway-type of socialism. These Marxists Have near total control of our colleges and education, government K-12 schools, the mainstream media, all the arts, and private and public social agencies.

Our nation’s freedom is **seriously** threatened and Rush continues to call the enemy “liberal” I am exasperated!

Rush is the most powerful of the conservative watchmen on the tower, and he has **consistently** ignored the enemy ( who has been growing in power over 20 or more years) and failed to sound the alarm.

[wintertime]

Another example: Rush doesn't have to use the words “lying assho!e” to describe Barack Obama
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Rush ( to his credit) **frequently** has called Obama a liar. Adding an a crude expletive would only weakening his statement of the truth.

Calling Chavez a “socialist” is NOT the truth.

Calling Pelosi, Obama, Ayers, and the other Marxists in our nation “socialists” isn't the truth either. What exasperates me is that I know that Rush knows it is not the truth.

[blake6900]

Wintertime, I understand what you're saying. But Limbaugh has, in his own way, turned the word "liberal" into an insult, so much so that many "liberals" have begun coining the term "progressive" to describe themselves. While I agree that words matter it seems that in this case your reasoning misses the point. While Limbaugh uses liberal to denounce Marxists, communists, Stalinists, socialists, etc. he also illustrates their beliefs and actions as contrary to conservative views. Liberals are always quick to call anyone that disagrees with them a Nazi and that, in and of itself, doesn't do much to further the debate. For Limbaugh to engage in the same activity would serve little purpose and, in my view, would allow liberals to change the subject matter from ideology to questioning their patriotism, a tactic they use everytime they're pushed into a corner.

Why give them that opportunity? I guess what I'm really saying is, "A turd is a turd, no matter what you call it." Reasonable, thoughtful people can discern what Limbaugh means regardless of what words he uses to say it. And those who can't never will.

[wintertime]

Liberals are always quick to call anyone that disagrees with them a Nazi and that, in and of itself, doesn't do much to further the debate. For Limbaugh to engage in the same activity would serve little purpose and, in my view, would allow liberals to change the subject matter from ideology to questioning their patriotism, a tactic they use everytime they're pushed into a corner.Liberals are always quick to call anyone that disagrees with them a Nazi and that, in and of itself, doesn't do much to further the debate. For Limbaugh to engage in the same activity would serve little purpose and, in my view, would allow liberals to change the subject matter from ideology to questioning their patriotism, a tactic they use everytime they're pushed into a corner.

Calling a conservative a Nazi is a lie. Calling a Marxist a Marxist is the truth. Big difference!

Rush Limbaugh has ***consistently*** negliglected to educate and inform his listeners how liberalism **is** Marxism. And...He has the talent and ability to move his listeners and our society into understanding how liberalism is Marxism and helping them to call liberals what they are: Marxists.

Honestly calling Chavez a "socialist", instead of the communist that he is, is merely one example of thousands over 20 years where Rush **deliberately** misled and continues to mislead his listeners. He must think we are idiots.

[blake6900]

Calling a conservative a Nazi is a lie. Calling a Marxist a Marxist is the truth. Big difference! Rush Limbaugh has ***consistently*** negliglected to educate and inform his listeners how liberalism **is** Marxism. And...He has the talent and ability to move his listeners and our society into understanding how liberalism is Marxism and helping them to call liberals what they are: Marxists.

OK. Honestly calling Chavez a "socialist", instead of the communist that he is, is merely one example of thousands over 20 years where Rush **deliberately** misled and continues to mislead his listeners. He must think we are idiots.

[jadedtom]

You just like to argue. I’m tired of arguing with you.

Take care,

Tom