> I’ll kindly end it there as I don’t feel up to typing out a book this morning.
(grin!) Fair enough.
I guess that is one key difference between your flavor of Conservatism and mine. I see nothing immoral about requiring convicts to work for their sustainance: quite the contrary. I believe it is immoral for them not to and would have no compunctions about requiring it, as the concept enjoys full support from the ultimate Conservative document, Holy Writ.
That’s one of the key advantages to Conservatism: differing conservative viewpoints can be accommodated without compromising the key underlying principles that make Conservatism — well — conservative.
Kudos to you and Boucheau...
An intelligent conversation that didn’t degrade into name calling and flame throwing. I wish there was more of that here on FR.