1 posted on
08/12/2009 3:48:16 AM PDT by
Pan_Yan
To: Pan_Yan
All this is an endorsement of these two for their constituents. Who benefits? Their districts. Who gets more money? Their districts. Regardless of what people in the other 433 congressional districts believe, these reps are responsible for money and jobs in their districts.
If you want congressmen booted out, you need to show their districts why they should be booted, not why they should be kept.
2 posted on
08/12/2009 3:58:41 AM PDT by
Quiller
(When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
To: Pan_Yan
What a stupid article.
This fool is actually suggesting that the stupid, wasteful, moronic, open to corruption and fraud cash-for-clunkers program, should be supported at the expense of the superb F-22 fighters which guarantee American air supremacy for decades to come?
What is he smoking?
To: Pan_Yan
What a stupid article.
This fool is actually suggesting that the stupid, wasteful, moronic, open to corruption and fraud cash-for-clunkers program, should be supported at the expense of the superb F-22 fighters which guarantee American air supremacy for decades to come?
What is he smoking?
To: Pan_Yan
I’m not completely sold on the F-22, but at least it’s the sort of thing our government is SUPPOSED to be spending money on. “Cash for clunkers” is nothing but bribing voters with their own money.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson