Posted on 11/13/2009 3:07:02 PM PST by rabscuttle385
Except that the party apparently, doesn't even read THEIR policies. I question if they apply the same diligence to our governance.
Good points.
Let’s hope Steele didn’t ‘cave’ due to his thoughts on pending Pelosicare!
You have a problem, a sanctimonious one.
Good news.
More like:
"After learning that the public had been made aware of the abortion coverage by a news report"
Exactly.
I just found out that 2/3 insurance companys cover abortions. I had no idea. Mine ony covers those where life of the mother is in danger of death, but no elective abortions. All this time I didn’t know that. I just assumed no way. Thankfully mine does not cover elective or I’d be outraged at myself. I think we will keep our insurance because there are a couple of times I believe if moms life is near death because of the pregnancy I agree it should be covered, like ectopic pregnancys. If they removed the language of covering abortions if the moms life is in danger than a woman who has an ectopic pregnancy or something like that would be stuck with a huge bill after a tramatic experience. I don’t like it, but through my husbands company this is the best we are going to get.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.