Skip to comments.
Maureen Dowd: Slouching Toward Washington (Wherein she attacks O'Donnell, Palin, Tea Party)
The New York Times ^
| September 25, 2010
| Maureen Dowd
Posted on 09/25/2010 3:01:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Whoever buys this fishwrap at the fire sale: Terminate so-called "journalists" like this if you're serious about ever showing a profit again.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Did she go to the premier of “Wall St 2, Money Never Sleeps”?
2
posted on
09/25/2010 3:03:54 PM PDT
by
AU72
To: 2ndDivisionVet
And another day goes by where the left does not try to sell its agenda.
Waste those days, Democrats!
3
posted on
09/25/2010 3:09:19 PM PDT
by
VanDeKoik
(1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“To which ODonnell rebutted, Why arent monkeys still evolving into humans?
From a scientific perspective, it's a legitimate question. If selective pressure favors the development of a specific evolutionary lineage, why do the ‘less fit’ members of this lineage persist? There are answers to that question, but her question was not a ‘stupid’ one.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
5
posted on
09/25/2010 3:11:39 PM PDT
by
stefanbatory
(Insert witty tagline here)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
You mean Moron Dudd STILL has a job???
6
posted on
09/25/2010 3:12:37 PM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(The upcoming election is the most important in our lifetimes!!! BE THERE!!!!!!!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Maher and Dowd. Now there’s a pair for you. Talk about a couple of slouches.
7
posted on
09/25/2010 3:13:53 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Don't listen to what they say, watch what they do.)
To: stefanbatory
8
posted on
09/25/2010 3:15:29 PM PDT
by
downwdims
(It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority)
To: AU72
It’s not smart for the left to cover this election like they are. If Castle had won the primary, he would have won the general election. A Republican would be in there anyway. They are elevating another Palin or Bachman. Why aren’t they more worried about the Reid/Angle race? It’s ridiculous how much information is coming out about her versus Obama. As far as Bill Maher, he lied for years that he was a libertarian/independent. He also claimed that Brazil was off oil, when they’re not.
To: pieceofthepuzzle
You're going way above her head with that answer! She's still looking in the mirror wondering why she can't be sweet-faced, too.
10
posted on
09/25/2010 3:16:37 PM PDT
by
JPG
(The rat plague ends on Nov 2nd.)
To: downwdims
I clicked for the article. I scrolled down for the CZJ.
11
posted on
09/25/2010 3:19:23 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(I am Derek Fenton! (me) Enjoying freedom ourselves requires tolerating it for others. (Jedidah))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
12
posted on
09/25/2010 3:23:07 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: pieceofthepuzzle
I’m waiting for monkeys to fly out of the
NYTs’ collective butt.
13
posted on
09/25/2010 3:24:43 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let’s be honest. Bill Maher and Mo Dowd trying to discuss science like they know what they’re talking about are evidence that Christine O’Donnell might have a point.
14
posted on
09/25/2010 3:29:54 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?)...Richard Frank DeCamp, 11/13/34-9/15/10, R.I.P.)
To: pieceofthepuzzle
If selective pressure favors the development of a specific evolutionary lineage, why do the less fit members of this lineage persist?Yeah, just how does the theory of evolution explain Bill Maher?
15
posted on
09/25/2010 3:31:44 PM PDT
by
kevao
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This woman makes 7 to 8 figures a year
Think about that while you're job hunting. :)
16
posted on
09/25/2010 3:32:26 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
17
posted on
09/25/2010 3:32:47 PM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
To: downwdims
I LOVE the rules!
18
posted on
09/25/2010 3:33:57 PM PDT
by
txnuke
(Obama votes "PRES__ENT" because he has no ID.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
19
posted on
09/25/2010 3:37:41 PM PDT
by
fr_freak
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This posting buries the lead. In the piece, Dodd writes, “President Obama was supposed to be a giant leap forward in modernity, the brainy, rational first black president leading us out of the scientific darkness of the W. years. But by letting nutters get a foothold, he may usher us into the past.”
Dodd and other NAZIonale Socialists are saying that the big
Lib should disallow “nutters” like O’Donnell from getting a
foothold. This would be by means of... suspending free elections? Being even more leftist to be even more popular?
Mind boggling that Dodd thinks that 0bama even has some say
about who “gets a foothold,” and boggling that Dodd’s still so elitist that she thinks once a “nutter” gets a foothold, the stupid masses will just follow along.
20
posted on
09/25/2010 3:41:23 PM PDT
by
WKTimpco
(Traditional Values Counter Revolution)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson