Posted on 02/18/2011 9:39:36 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Coulter is not a sincere conservative.
“Palin has no shot”
But Coulter opposes Palin running because it would “be a step down for her.”
Comes down to: Coulter’s argument against Palin running is incoherent.
Wink, nudge.
Cheers!
And unlike Obama, she knows her own limitations and will choose solid advisors, not Marxist ideologues.
Nice try, though.
Maybe you haven't noticed, but numbers among the mushy-headed are fickle.
Obama's ratings shot up after Tucson, and have now fallen back to their accustomed abysmal state.
Do you really think the Madison antics (coupled with Jersey, coupled with New York, and together with whatever shenanigans the SEIU will pull off in the near future), together with $5.00/gallon gas, will make Sarah Palin *LESS* attractive?
I mean, I know the $17.00/hour paid to union thugs in Wisconsin looks good to you right now from your mother's basement, but trust me, this is America. With a natural-born citizen in the White House and a Tea-party filled House and Senate, you can do a *whole* lot better than that.
Vote for Sarah in 2012 and you'll get to experience it for yourself.
BTW, you do have your GED, right?
Cheers!
After having a failed 40-something president who had minimal experience, I think America is going to want a different type next time. In fact, if the two major parties make it Obama v Palin, I expect a serious 3rd party challenge.
Or is it György?
Cheers!
Or is it György?
Cheers!
He has got to do that. If he does, then he can think about jumping in.
What strikes me is that since she regained her feet with the debate with Biden she has not wobbled. Obviously she is a quick study and she has been doing the cramming that the snobs urged on her in 2009. She has good instincts and gobs of guts. But events will determine the outcomes. I look forward to the May “debates.”
If he succeeds, he’d win in a walk, I think.
Unless he blunders as Daniels has. The attempt to separate social conservative from economic ones is a mistaken strategy, as Phil Gramm found out. Phil’s problem was that his opposition to social liberalism lacked any real conviction. The same seems true of Daniels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.