Why don’t we just have a campaign and see who wins?..... excopconservative
"Why don’t we just have a campaign and see who wins?"
So, you do not believe that discussing the issues during this pre-convention phase is part of a "campaign"?
Must everybody be in mindless and unquestioning Sarah Palin-Worship Mode until she is nominated by the 40% of the True Believers of a Party that only represents 29% of all voters?
As the Democrat Party becomes more Far-Left, more voters are leaving it to become Independents. Many of the Democrats that remain in the Democrat Party just ADORE Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi, among all voters, has Unfavorable ratings that are only slightly higher than Sarah Palin's Unfavorable ratings.
If the Nancy Pelosi fanatics had the majority within the minority Democrat Party to ensure the Democrat nomination for Nancy Pelosi, don't you think that it would behoove a Democrat who still has his feet planted in reality to point out that nominating a candidate with stratospheric Unfavorable ratings is probably not the brightest move to make and pretty much guarantess a Political Darwin Award?
.jpg)
"Whadda mean Nancy Pelosi would lose big in the general election. How dare you even question the infallibility of Nancy Pelosi? Why don't we just have a campaign and see who wins?"
You can stick your head in the sand and hide from the Sarah Palin reality if you want to but that reality is not going to go away just because you refuse to acknowledge or even discuss what a political disaster a Sarah Palin nomination would be.
FOX News Poll (February 7-9, 2011)
Question 3: I am going to read you a list of names. Tell me if you think that person would make a good President or not.
Sarah Palin:
.................YES.........NO.......DK.....Never heard of
ALL...........23%.......72%.........4%.......1%
Dem ...........7%........87%........5%.......1%
Rep ...........40%.......56%.......3%.......1%
Ind ...........25%........69%.......3%.......1%