Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Red_Devil 232
We can’t let him get to where Dole was in 1996 ... he needs to be shown the door in the early state primaries!

The point isn't the Romney needs to be shown the door before its too late. Its that there's noone else right now so Romney's most likely going to be the guy. After him (and he'll lose IMO) the candidates just get weaker. Sarah's not running, and I don't think she's ready. (I'm waiting with an open mind) There's still time for a suddenly ready up and comer (Gad, Bush disappointed me) but that window is rapidly closing.

17 posted on 05/22/2011 7:45:53 PM PDT by MichiganMan (Oprah: Commercial Beef Agriculture=Bad, Commercial Chicken Agriculture=Good...Wait, WTF???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: MichiganMan

Yeah, right, she’s “not ready”. Another concern troll.


18 posted on 05/22/2011 8:06:44 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: MichiganMan

“Sarah’s not running, and I don’t think she’s ready. (I’m waiting with an open mind) There’s still time for a suddenly ready up and comer (Gad, Bush disappointed me) but that window is rapidly closing.”

“Rapidly closing?”

A lot of people in this forum weren’t around in 1968.

Lyndon Johnson had made a dramatic announcement that he would not run for president again.

Eugene McCarthy and Hubert Humphrey were fighting it out for the democratic nomination to replace Johnson (as Richard Nixon was ramping up for his run, too).

Then, almost out of nowhere, a third candidate overshadowed them both:
Robert Kennedy, who had been “waiting in the wings”, so to speak.

I was 18 around then, and not as politically aware as I am today, but I recall that Kennedy wasn’t particularly active in the earliest primaries, but then jumped in later on. He scored a big win in California — and of course, we know what happened that night.

Had he not been killed, Kennedy would almost certainly have gone on to win the nomination and quite possibly may have beaten Richard Nixon as well.

But the point was (and is) that it doesn’t matter so much when you enter the contest, but how well you do once you are in. All to often, the “early runners” burn out and self-destruct.

We’re seeing that with the Republicans right now.
They are falling fast!

It would be to Sarah Palin’s advantage to NOT enter the contest too soon. Let the other losers duke it out — then come in with a bang!

Just sayin’....


21 posted on 05/22/2011 9:37:32 PM PDT by Grumplestiltskin (I may look new, but it's only deja vu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: MichiganMan

Sorry I don’t hold Romney THAT HIGH. I would put Romney close to the bottom of the barrel.

What’s amazing to me thought is that I see most conservatives and people on the right against Romney. Just like McCain. But some how the GOP establishment manages to get their loser candidate (McCain last time) the nomination.

It’s almost as if the primary’s are rigid. For instance, last election most Republicans/Conservatives did not understand how McCain won the nomination? I know prior to McCain getting the nomination... 8 out of 10 Republicans were against McCain! How in the heck did he win it?

Now once McCain got the nomination and he put Palin on the ticket... it changed things with conservatives. Prior to that I just did not understand how McCain won the primaries?

Rest assured if Mitt Romney gets it, then Obama has already won 2012. Oh and our Republic as we know it will be probably over. Hate to say it, but look how much destruction Obama and the congress has done in the last 2 1/2 years.


23 posted on 05/23/2011 3:24:16 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson