Skip to comments.MO Congresswoman caught comparing gay marriage to incest, paedophilia, letting three-year-olds drive
Posted on 06/27/2011 7:58:27 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Footage has emerged showing Missouri congresswoman Vicky Hartzler comparing gay marriage to incest, paedophilia and allowing three-year-olds to drive.
The Tea Party-backed politician told a conference of college students that if same-sex marriages were allowed, it would lead to paedophiles and polygamists being allowed to marry.
In secretly recorded video, posted on YouTube, Mrs Hartzler said: Well, think about it. That starts you down the road to opening up licensure to basically meaning that the license would mean nothing.
(VIDEO AT LINK)
If you just cared about somebody, have a committed relationship, why not allow one man and two women or three women to marry?
There are a lot of people in this country that support polygamy. Why not? Theyre committed to each other. Why should you care? Why not allow group marriage? There are people out there who want that.....
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I’d vote for her over Cohen in a heartbeat. Then again, that isn’t saying much.
Wouldn't it, though?
I agree with Mrs. Hartzler.
pedophilia and incest normalizations are definitely on the same list
Remembeer the liberals on the US Supreme Court who said the Lawrence v. Texas case would not lead the way to gay marriage? They lied.
She is absolutely right... Even worst than that...
the truth hurts don’t it!
Caught? She was giving a speech.
Was Lincoln "caught" saying "four score and seven years ago"?
The inclusion of the word “caught” in the headline exposes the headline writer as a faggot.
No surprise at the London Daily mail, lol! That place is loaded with faggots.
That is going to give me nightmares. Poor kid.
It would be nice if for once a Congress man or woman would stick to their guns and say, “damn right I said it and I mean it!” Instead of running for PC cover.
“If you just cared about somebody, have a committed relationship, why not allow one man and two women or three women to marry? “
This will absolutely happen now. Some are just to blind too see it or just don’t care.
In my best nasal, whining voice “If it doesn’t affect me, why would I care?” is the standard thing one would hear.
It is rather obvious that having a Court claim that gay marraige is a right sets a precedent for allowing polygamy and incestual marraige.
Having a Court also claim that gay marraige is a right though also sets a precedent for denying the People a right to representation on issues of public decency.
If we have no representation on defining sexuality in regards to gender then why should we have a right to representation on defining sexuality in regards to age?
Having a Court set such a precedent can also eventually lead to a future where we have no right to define the ‘age of consent’. Right now it is defined through law by the People through their right to representation but it could easily be asked “Why should you be able to tell another family when their children are ready for sexual relations?” “How does it effect you if someone else’s child gets married at ten years old?”
The gay rights movement is an attack on our right to representation, our right to association, and our freedom of speech being that they want to outlaw all opposition to their perverse morality.
Mental abuse by the parent....obviously the kid has some values which are getting corrupted.
Vicky Hartzler for President?
Why not, the key is committed relationship. Hell I have one of those with my German Shepherd, I am committed to feeding her and she is committed to biting anyone who is unwelcome on my property. This is going to destroy marriage. A husband can explain away an affair by simply marrying the mistress. NAMBL must love all this gay marriage crap.
Either that or we just put her in the back of the Jeep with an M240 and drive her around.
Thank God that there are still people who can make a difference willing to state the obvious truth amid stifling, dangerous political correctness. We need this type of courage in many more so-called conservative politicians.