Skip to comments.
Romney:"It wasn't clear what I stood for"
The Politico ^
| October 1, 2011
| Maggie Haberman
Posted on 10/01/2011 11:02:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
RINO-riffic!!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is no ordinary RINO. Most people know that rino's are rino's. This guy tries to make people think he's a conservative.
2
posted on
10/01/2011 11:14:02 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(I'm a heartless conservative because I love this country.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It's never clear what you stand for, when you are standing for nothing except election or re-election.
No way, Romney. Not if you held a gun to my head.
/johnny
To: ari-freedom
“Romney was all praise for Huckabee and his strengths”
Politics DOES make for strange bedfellows. Especially when you consider the way the Huckabee and McCain camps blew Romney out of the race last Super Tuesday in WV.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08037/855056-176.stm
4
posted on
10/01/2011 11:20:37 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(Obama & Holder LLP, Procurers of fine arms to the most discerning drug lords (202) 456-1414)
To: ari-freedom
It was an excellent interview.
5
posted on
10/01/2011 11:20:50 PM PDT
by
flaglady47
(When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Prove you can do it mitt. You care nothing about Americans and less for those in MA with your romneycare.
Sarah Palin was very strong
Sarah is and always was very strong and she isn't even a candidate, yet. Mitt's greatest fear - all his snake oil political talk can't outshine a candidate with proven accomplishments of being FOR AMERICA.
To: ari-freedom
How could anyone know where he actually stands on anyhing because he has been on every side of every issue.
Its obvious some are fooled and we must keep reminding them. The good news is his polls number are staying the same and he hasn’t benefited from any of the others who have slipped.
To: flaglady47
To: Roccus
My mother loves Huckabee but hates Romney. She is not going to understand this at all.
Come to think of it I don’t either.
To: tirednvirginia
There's a reason they are called
POLITICIANS
(I wish I knew the emoticon for dripping disdain)
10
posted on
10/01/2011 11:38:06 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(Obama & Holder LLP, Procurers of fine arms to the most discerning drug lords (202) 456-1414)
To: tirednvirginia
How could anyone know where he actually stands on anyhing because he has been on every side of every issue. --------------------------
Spot on tirednvirginia!
You'll need a weathervane to determine which way Romney will stand on any given issue. Mitt will change his policies at any given moment depending on who is listening. Just too fake, plastic and untrustworthy.
11
posted on
10/01/2011 11:41:04 PM PDT
by
BobP
(The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The one issue on which he’s been consistent is believing in Gore Bull Warming. Wrong in 2008. Wrong in 2012, even after Climategate!
12
posted on
10/01/2011 11:48:51 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Anybody but Baracchio in 2012)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It’s no longer a matter of stopping Obama but rather - How do we stop Romney?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How quaint! Our 17th place frontrunner interviewing our 12th place frontrunner.
14
posted on
10/02/2011 12:06:29 AM PDT
by
meadsjn
(Sarah 2012, or sooner)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is an old cartoon, so don't forget the "Pro-Communist Health Care" and "Anti-Communist Health Care" podiums:
To: Berlin_Freeper
Its no longer a matter of stopping Obama but rather - How do we stop Romney?
Easy! Get Christy to run. We need 2 RINO's in the race to split votes.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“It wasn`t clear what I stood for”
Wow.. how soon before the dems start running ads with those words if Mittens gets the nomination...
17
posted on
10/02/2011 1:45:20 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(With "successes" like the Libya adventure, who needs failure?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have said it once, I’ve said it twice, I’ll say it again, I would rather fight with Obama for another 4 years than elect Mitt Romney as POTUS. My personal electoral beatitude requires only a Republican/conservative house and senate so, if the next President isn’t a staunch conservative, I would prefer 4 more years of divided government. No more RINOs.
18
posted on
10/02/2011 4:23:54 AM PDT
by
RC one
(Voting isn't a simple act of civic duty anymore, it's a complex act of civil war.)
To: Roccus
One Rino To Another,Takes one to Know one,Huckabee and Romney,two Peas in a Pod
To: RC one
So he can find more things to deligitimize the Congress and rule by executive order fiat combined with regulating us to death? He still has one more year to turn up his dictatorship and look how he has started going the Full Monty in the last couple of months. I’m really concerned about outlasting him for the next year, nevermind four more years. We all saw what the last lame duck session did.
I’m sorry, but Romney won’t win it, as much as the media wants it.
20
posted on
10/02/2011 4:58:58 AM PDT
by
mazda77
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson