Forbes wants Perry to wound Gingrich in Iowa so Romney can have a bigger victory in Newt Hampshire.
Why does everyone always suspect a Pro-Romney conspiracy where there is none?
Forbes endorsed Perry a long time back, and seems to be sticking with it.
Doesn’t seem to have anything to do with Romney or the suddenly-conservative hero Newt.
Palin was for Forbes in 1996.
Forbes was not for Romney in 2008.
Forbes is for neither Romney nor Gingrich in 2012. This should not be surprising to anyone with even a minor command of the facts.
So, if you're Steve Forbes, with a magazine and residue of cred to your name, whom do you support in 2012?
I was for the guy who turned out to be the Godfather of bimbo eruptions. So, now I need to recalibrate.
If Bachmann can make it, she has my vote. If Perry can make it, I'll vote for him. If Ron catches on, what the hell, he has my vote. Hell, even if Huntsman ...
If Gingrich is the nominee, he'll have my enthusiastic support! But fasten your seatbelts, folks, for a Gingrich Administration!
But, God forbid, the plastic, fake, phony Romney!