Posted on 01/17/2012 7:41:33 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
You made a statement like you understood the game that is being played (yes, agreed, politics is a game), without saying what the “game” was.
When asked to explain yourself, you refused to, and answered the question with a question.
The conclusion that you do not understand the game is inescapable.
I would be all in for that.A hill worth dying on.
Sarah stated an opinion about what she would do. I'm not sure how you think she is preventing people from "deciding for themselves" what they would do.
The standing joke actually fact is that Newt should cut and carve a ‘second’ party run.
Angelo de Codavilla nailed the true nature of the makeup of powers of today.
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/16/americas-ruling-class-and-the/print
There is one party today that is the Ruling Class and they comprise Rs and Ds,
Then there is the Country Class that has no party as of yet. If Newt can pull off forming a Country Party and winning the Whitehouse, then we are all on the road to reform and recapturing our heritage, and the decentralization of power will begin.
But of course it will not go without a fight.
Here’s the Palin quote.
Naaaah. Your PDS derangement and constant frothing at the mouth on Sarah Palin threads got old long ago.
Meanwhile, you will explain to us, how Sarah Palin saying she’d vote for Newt if she were in South Carolina, stops anyone from making up their minds.
Sigh.
And typical.
A perfectly logical observation made on the logical absurdity and hypocrisy of your comment is greeted by mere vulgarity.
How about trying a substantive counter-argument next time if you don’t agree with a point?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.