Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin tips her hand
The Daily Caller ^ | February 16, 2012 | Bart Marcois, Romney volunteer & RNC LDS Outreach Liason

Posted on 02/17/2012 12:01:02 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I believe she could actually pull this off!


21 posted on 02/17/2012 1:03:07 PM PST by pvoce ('Good' sense and 'Common' sense are two entirely different concepts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
You know what this is don't you? It's time to follow the other Lemmings and swarm Santorum. Why?.........don't know.....just put a bag over your head, and follow. And go off of what you heard someone else say.

Can he win? Is that a loaded question? Who cares. He is a CONservative you know. He's a family man. Likes home schooling. His sweater vest looks nice in church. Can he fix this economic mess we are in? Sure, why not........he's a CONservative. you know.........

22 posted on 02/17/2012 1:03:40 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: throwback

If, as has been suggested, this has been her plan all along, and if she succeeds in getting the nomination would you be willing to concede that she is a brilliant strategist? Would you admit that we need some brilliant strategies to bring us out of this mess that Obama and his cabal have engineered? Would you vote for her if she did end up the nominee?


23 posted on 02/17/2012 1:07:38 PM PST by Josephat (The old claim your evengelizing people who haven't heard the gospel, but go to a Catholic country tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

LOL bttt


24 posted on 02/17/2012 1:10:55 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("Without consequences, there's no virtue". ~ Rush Limbaugh 12:51 PM, Friday, 2/17/2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Josephat
<[>
If, as has been suggested, this has been her plan all along, and if she succeeds in getting the nomination would you be willing to concede that she is a brilliant strategist? Would you admit that we need some brilliant strategies to bring us out of this mess that Obama and his cabal have engineered? Would you vote for her if she did end up the nominee?


Hell Yes!


25 posted on 02/17/2012 1:11:21 PM PST by B-Cause (The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money - Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Really, she’s been running for 3 years? And yet her primary totals to date are...zero.


26 posted on 02/17/2012 1:11:34 PM PST by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Josephat
If, as has been suggested, this has been her plan all along, and if she succeeds in getting the nomination would you be willing to concede that she is a brilliant strategist? Would you admit that we need some brilliant strategies to bring us out of this mess that Obama and his cabal have engineered? Would you vote for her if she did end up the nominee?


Hell Yes!

27 posted on 02/17/2012 1:12:56 PM PST by B-Cause (The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money - Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: throwback
How magnanimous. After a dozen other people have slogged through the trenches for a year fighting the good fight of long days, crowds, lack of sleep, endlessly pleading their case, begging for money, yada, yada, the queen will deign to intervene at the convention to assume the crown when asked. I'd rather vote for someone that worked for it thank you.

If one can't earn a majority of delegates after slogging through the trenches for a year endlessly pleading their case, then they obviously have a problem.

There is no affirmative action set-aside for sucky candidates.

There is no right to the nomination just because one spends the time working for it.

You with your snide post and the four stooges currently running take note.

28 posted on 02/17/2012 1:14:24 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Egads, you are poisonous and most foul and vindictive. Heaven help you.

Go away.


29 posted on 02/17/2012 1:14:31 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah keeps telling us to vote for Newt. Perhaps it’s her strategy to force a brokered convention. I don’t know. I just know I will not vote for Romney, I’ve never had much respect for Newt and Santorum is an unknown quantity. I trust Sarah but should I do as she says and vote for Newt or follow my heart and write her in? I don’t know. Maybe in a few weeks things will be clearer.


30 posted on 02/17/2012 1:15:18 PM PST by oldfart (Obama nation = abomination. Think about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A lot of Freepers are very slow learners when it comes to Sarah Palin.

I say this as a person who likes her very much, this is nothing against her.


31 posted on 02/17/2012 1:16:05 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: throwback

She is known to do the impossible.


32 posted on 02/17/2012 1:16:16 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: oldfart

Writing people in is a waste of time and no one will notice or report it.

If you want to put people through 4 more years of Obama, I can only pity you.


33 posted on 02/17/2012 1:17:56 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Ditto that. I'll vote for someone who ran. Santorum, Newt, and even Romney. I won't vote for the color commentator.
34 posted on 02/17/2012 1:18:16 PM PST by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
COLB PALIN
35 posted on 02/17/2012 1:19:10 PM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

I was told a long time ago that success goes to those who work smarter, not harder. If she succeeds in getting the nomination without having her family dragged through the mud for a year, she is working smarter than any of the current contenders. I want a Pres. Who works smarter, certainly smarter than the current poser.


36 posted on 02/17/2012 1:19:28 PM PST by Josephat (The old claim your evengelizing people who haven't heard the gospel, but go to a Catholic country tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Sorry Palin but it’s either Mitt, Newt or Rick. They may be imperfect candidates but at least they’ve made the effort.

At the moment, I'm for Newt. That said, if Mitt, Newt, Rick, and Ru don't earn the needed delegates, then all bets are off.

Sorry, one's effort doesn't matter if one can't earn the majority of delegates.

37 posted on 02/17/2012 1:20:40 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

The whole idea of this scam is to help Romney. That is why the person that works for Mitt penned this nonsense.

Keep the conservative vote all split because they know it will help Mitt and that there will be no brokered convention.

really pathetic


38 posted on 02/17/2012 1:21:44 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: throwback
and even Romney

You really do hate our country - now the world knows.

39 posted on 02/17/2012 1:22:20 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Ditto that. I'll vote for someone who ran. Santorum, Newt, and even Romney. I won't vote for the color commentator.
40 posted on 02/17/2012 1:23:13 PM PST by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson