Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin tips her hand
The Daily Caller ^
| February 16, 2012
| Bart Marcois, Romney volunteer & RNC LDS Outreach Liason
Posted on 02/17/2012 12:01:02 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I believe she could actually pull this off!
21
posted on
02/17/2012 1:03:07 PM PST
by
pvoce
('Good' sense and 'Common' sense are two entirely different concepts.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
You know what this is don't you? It's time to follow the other Lemmings and swarm Santorum. Why?.........don't know.....just put a bag over your head, and follow. And go off of what you heard someone else say.
Can he win? Is that a loaded question? Who cares. He is a CONservative you know. He's a family man. Likes home schooling. His sweater vest looks nice in church. Can he fix this economic mess we are in? Sure, why not........he's a CONservative. you know.........
22
posted on
02/17/2012 1:03:40 PM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: throwback
If, as has been suggested, this has been her plan all along, and if she succeeds in getting the nomination would you be willing to concede that she is a brilliant strategist? Would you admit that we need some brilliant strategies to bring us out of this mess that Obama and his cabal have engineered? Would you vote for her if she did end up the nominee?
23
posted on
02/17/2012 1:07:38 PM PST
by
Josephat
(The old claim your evengelizing people who haven't heard the gospel, but go to a Catholic country tr)
To: Scythian
24
posted on
02/17/2012 1:10:55 PM PST
by
Matchett-PI
("Without consequences, there's no virtue". ~ Rush Limbaugh 12:51 PM, Friday, 2/17/2012)
To: Josephat
<[>
If, as has been suggested, this has been her plan all along, and if she succeeds in getting the nomination would you be willing to concede that she is a brilliant strategist? Would you admit that we need some brilliant strategies to bring us out of this mess that Obama and his cabal have engineered? Would you vote for her if she did end up the nominee?
Hell Yes!
25
posted on
02/17/2012 1:11:21 PM PST
by
B-Cause
(The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money - Thatcher)
To: presently no screen name
Really, she’s been running for 3 years? And yet her primary totals to date are...zero.
26
posted on
02/17/2012 1:11:34 PM PST
by
throwback
( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
To: Josephat
If, as has been suggested, this has been her plan all along, and if she succeeds in getting the nomination would you be willing to concede that she is a brilliant strategist? Would you admit that we need some brilliant strategies to bring us out of this mess that Obama and his cabal have engineered? Would you vote for her if she did end up the nominee?
Hell Yes!
27
posted on
02/17/2012 1:12:56 PM PST
by
B-Cause
(The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money - Thatcher)
To: throwback
How magnanimous. After a dozen other people have slogged through the trenches for a year fighting the good fight of long days, crowds, lack of sleep, endlessly pleading their case, begging for money, yada, yada, the queen will deign to intervene at the convention to assume the crown when asked. I'd rather vote for someone that worked for it thank you. If one can't earn a majority of delegates after slogging through the trenches for a year endlessly pleading their case, then they obviously have a problem.
There is no affirmative action set-aside for sucky candidates.
There is no right to the nomination just because one spends the time working for it.
You with your snide post and the four stooges currently running take note.
To: presently no screen name
Egads, you are poisonous and most foul and vindictive. Heaven help you.
Go away.
29
posted on
02/17/2012 1:14:31 PM PST
by
dforest
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sarah keeps telling us to vote for Newt. Perhaps it’s her strategy to force a brokered convention. I don’t know. I just know I will not vote for Romney, I’ve never had much respect for Newt and Santorum is an unknown quantity. I trust Sarah but should I do as she says and vote for Newt or follow my heart and write her in? I don’t know. Maybe in a few weeks things will be clearer.
30
posted on
02/17/2012 1:15:18 PM PST
by
oldfart
(Obama nation = abomination. Think about it!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A lot of Freepers are very slow learners when it comes to Sarah Palin.
I say this as a person who likes her very much, this is nothing against her.
31
posted on
02/17/2012 1:16:05 PM PST
by
SaxxonWoods
(....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
To: throwback
She is known to do the impossible.
To: oldfart
Writing people in is a waste of time and no one will notice or report it.
If you want to put people through 4 more years of Obama, I can only pity you.
33
posted on
02/17/2012 1:17:56 PM PST
by
dforest
To: ari-freedom
Ditto that. I'll vote for someone who ran. Santorum, Newt, and even Romney. I won't vote for the color commentator.
34
posted on
02/17/2012 1:18:16 PM PST
by
throwback
( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
35
posted on
02/17/2012 1:19:10 PM PST
by
FrankR
(You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
To: ari-freedom
I was told a long time ago that success goes to those who work smarter, not harder. If she succeeds in getting the nomination without having her family dragged through the mud for a year, she is working smarter than any of the current contenders. I want a Pres. Who works smarter, certainly smarter than the current poser.
36
posted on
02/17/2012 1:19:28 PM PST
by
Josephat
(The old claim your evengelizing people who haven't heard the gospel, but go to a Catholic country tr)
To: ari-freedom
Sorry Palin but its either Mitt, Newt or Rick. They may be imperfect candidates but at least theyve made the effort.At the moment, I'm for Newt. That said, if Mitt, Newt, Rick, and Ru don't earn the needed delegates, then all bets are off.
Sorry, one's effort doesn't matter if one can't earn the majority of delegates.
To: ari-freedom
The whole idea of this scam is to help Romney. That is why the person that works for Mitt penned this nonsense.
Keep the conservative vote all split because they know it will help Mitt and that there will be no brokered convention.
really pathetic
38
posted on
02/17/2012 1:21:44 PM PST
by
dforest
To: throwback
and even Romney You really do hate our country - now the world knows.
To: ari-freedom
Ditto that. I'll vote for someone who ran. Santorum, Newt, and even Romney. I won't vote for the color commentator.
40
posted on
02/17/2012 1:23:13 PM PST
by
throwback
( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson