Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Scott Brown’s reelection campaign was incredibly lame, imho. Basically, he was a complete wuss. Instead going to Washington to fight Obama, he promised to get along with Democrats. His opponent was one of the most risible political figures in American political life, a manifest hypocrite and liar and he couldn’t beat her.

His campaign was basically a repudiation of principle (rebranded ‘ideology’) and an embrace of opportunism and compromise. He deserved to lose, even though Warren deserved to lose more. It was the 1962 Mets vs. the 2012 Red Sox. At least the 1962 Mets had the excuse of being an expansion club.


5 posted on 03/12/2013 2:49:17 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (What word begins with "O" and ends in economic collapse?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Scott Brown double Crossed Conservatives.

He was and is untrustworthy, he was just a Democrat in disguise.Conservative Republicans worked hard for him and he crapped on them.An Irish curse on his pathetic career as a lobbyist.


7 posted on 03/12/2013 4:33:14 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Scott Brown’s reelection campaign was incredibly lame, imho. Basically, he was a complete wuss. Instead going to Washington to fight Obama, he promised to get along with Democrats.

Agree! Brown had long enough to prove the worth of christian principles, and completely failed to do so.He was not a "Palin" type ideologue, he was exactly opposite to that model of virtue.

8 posted on 03/12/2013 5:21:43 AM PDT by imardmd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson