[JCBreckenridge]

But not unborn children. It’s a-ok in all 50 states to kill one.

That’s the point. If you don’t believe unborn children are actually people, you are going to side with ‘states rights’ on this issue.

Some things are the purview of the states - protecting the life of unborn children is not one of these.

[uncommonsense]

"If you don’t believe unborn children are actually people, you are going to side with ‘states rights’ on this issue."

You have your facts backward. There are states which have implemented the most restrictive bans on abortion. That kind of momentum, especially when those states actually protect liberty versus your dream of relying on the Fedgov to uphold virtues, will turn the tide against tyranny. Your solution is a totally lost cause.

New Deal. New Society, New Federalism, compassionate consertativism - it's all the same thing from both parties - the idea of those in power trumps the constitution.

[uncommonsense]

"But not unborn children. It’s a-ok in all 50 states to kill one"

Because of the Fedgov's overbearing control of our "general welfare", "privacy", "interstate commerce", "taxing authority". These are all doctrines of our two party national federal supremacy war over matters relegated to states by the constitution. You argue with yourself on this matter.