Posted on 04/28/2014 6:10:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
If that's the case, then we might as well pack it up right now and surrender because it won't matter WHO the person is. The media and LSM will distort that "personae of who ____ is" and will vilify WHOEVER the limited government Christian right sider 2nd Party/NEW party political figure that rises to sate the political appetite of the MAJORITY of legitimate voting Americans.
Yes -- the majority, Americans who have systematically been overridden by a cheating minority. The MSM has folks bamboozled into thinking that the news it so carefully shapes and spins is "America," and then there's the real America, the one where malevolent leftists like Reid, Obama, Pelosi, etc., were rejected on the ground but who got official power via just enough fraudulent votes to tip the balance. That proves that there are more of us than there are of them. The MSM's villainous right and the "masses" who cheer and vote for liberal losers, are as real as the Easter Bunny.
You vest final authority in the media with your approach, Fai Mao. You have already surrendered to tyranny of a cheating minority.
THANK YOU, Sauropd!
Leaving the ballot blank is dumb. It's smarter to USE that vote to weaken whichever liberal wanker wins, Democrat or Republican. When you "vote 3rd party at least," you contribute to the plurality count. THAT WAS A GOOD THING when Perot's third party split put Clinton in on such a crappy plurality (57% rejected him) the first time that he got steamrolled by the Republican Revolution, and the second time (51 % rejected him), he was impeached.
Vote third party if only to vote for a plurality. A plurality split WILL AID CONSERVATISM whereas a majority for either liberal candidate, R or D, would aid leftism.
You are such a surrender monkey, I can’t believe it! If a winning candidate depends on how the LSM paints him/her, then give up now. You are hunting unicorns.
Well, we can pray! I think it is probable that we're going to need a third (SECOND!) party in 2016.
Just so PDsers would have some reason to storm the Palin threads I guess. Sems to work well too.
Strangely the same reasons that the GOPe fear her.
Serious about what? Serious about being a political force to be reckoned with? You Betcha!
Since when does anyone have to run for the Presidency to be a political force to be reckoned? If anything I think the position is vastly overrated.
I didn’t like her using the imagery of baptism. I have no objection to waterboarding in those circumstances where it’s appropriate, but it has nothing to do with the Christian sacrament of baptism. Her remark was unworthy, it offended many Christians, and she should just apologize and not dig herself in deeper.
It was also good when Ralph Nader ran. We (DC Chapter) saw him going into some ‘Rat event or other.
We made sure to thank him.
Oh “you betcha” I do!
But I was on to you anyways, however, I thought you played it out BRILLIANTLY. Your quick responses were spot in and hilarious.
They inspired me. I’m not even kidding. Keep up the good work.
“I didn’t like her using the imagery of baptism.”
So, there are lots of things I don’t like. Suck it up. Quit being a crybaby about it. Jesus wasn’t offended I promise.
“I have no objection to waterboarding in those circumstances where it’s appropriate, but it has nothing to do with the Christian sacrament of baptism.”
what’s your point? Of course the 2 don’t relate, that’s what made the comment funny.
“Her remark was unworthy, it offended many Christians”
No it didn’t. Please stop making stuff up. Who cares, we need to stop getting offended so easily. If that offended those so called Christians, then they certainly won’t be able to handle REAL persecution when it comes. Christians came out in a massive show of support for her actually, even when prompted to be offended by Hermann Cain and Laura Ingram
“and she should just apologize and not dig herself in deeper.”
Lol, so now we are turning into liberals demanding apologies every time our feelings are hurt? Besides, if you haven’t been baptized the way scripture instructs, then you are making a much worse mockery of baptism than you accuse Palin of.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.