Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Sarah Palin serious about 2016
The Daily Iowan | April 28, 2014 | Cassidy Riley

Posted on 04/28/2014 6:10:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Link only: http://www.dailyiowan.com/2014/04/28/Metro/37707.html


TOPICS: Iowa; Campaign News; Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: 2016; gop; haters; hatersgonnahate; iowa; palin; palinisout; pds; sarahpalin; wontrun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: MrsEmmaPeel

Because she clearly felt she owed him. I do distinctly remember reading that.


41 posted on 04/28/2014 6:42:50 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel

I think Palin is forever loyal to McCain.

I don’t like it, but I also did not nominate Ms. Palin as my running mate, and America’s Vice Presidential candidate in 2008.

McCain is a special case. I don’t think it is fair to criticize Palin for supporting McCain. McCain introduced her to all of us.

I am not supporting McCain, but he’s a special case to Palin.


42 posted on 04/28/2014 6:43:31 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

McCain must know Palin isn’t running. He is slobbering all over the Hildebeast.


43 posted on 04/28/2014 6:45:02 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It was said that she clearly felt that she owed him b/c of the VP nomination in 2008.

Note to Sarah: your debt is paid. Ignore McQueeg.


44 posted on 04/28/2014 6:45:21 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

I actually think Palin was preparing to run in 2012, something changed her mind.

I think she is currently deciding whether to run.

Give her time.


45 posted on 04/28/2014 6:45:53 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let me try... Palin is, above all, loyal. McCain reached into Alaska in ‘08 and handed a political neophyte the opportunity of a lifetime. If her great sin is supporting her benefactor, well... we could do much worse.


46 posted on 04/28/2014 6:47:38 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I don’t think she is in it ONLY for the money, but rather she cares about the direction of the country and cashing in is a nice side effect.

The gall of her! Money money money. All she does is talk about how much money she makes to help support her quite large family. I don't blame you one bit for holding her responsible for her capitalistic behavior. Shame!

And something else: she hasn't even paid off all her family's defense lawyer bills yet!

She's a slacker, too. Quits in the middle of every single Governor's position she ever has held.

(What did I omit?)
47 posted on 04/28/2014 6:48:07 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Some of us knew about Palin before McLame.

Neener, neener, neener...


48 posted on 04/28/2014 6:48:11 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ll vote Palin. First choice, actually. Followed by Cruz. Then maybe two or three unlikely long-shots, like Gohmert or Lee. But that’s about it.

Otherwise, I’m not going to bother with the GOP nominee. I no longer have any trust in the Party whatsoever. Watching them cave on everything from amnesty to spending to social issues, the GOP obviously no longer shares my views. I left my presidential ballot blank in 2012, and I’ll do so again in 2016.


49 posted on 04/28/2014 6:49:18 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Hell, she probably hasn’t paid for that gynormous fence she erected between her and the stalker author who’s dead now...


50 posted on 04/28/2014 6:49:38 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Walker: Will he run? Pence: Will he run? Both are good, and Pence is my governor so I’m prejudiced there. But against Hillary? Dead losers.


51 posted on 04/28/2014 6:50:04 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: greene66

Vote 3rd party at least.

If you leave your ballot blank, Al Franken can claim you voted for him...


52 posted on 04/28/2014 6:50:51 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Oh yeah, I forgot:

She even says she can see Russia from her front porch! HAHA. LOL. (s/fx: RINO belches)


53 posted on 04/28/2014 6:51:03 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

There was a Freeper chick that swore to the bitter end Perry was going to come from behind and secure the nomination in 2012. The two of you seem to share the same capacity for delusion.


54 posted on 04/28/2014 6:51:11 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

You omitted that you are an obvious troll. . Laughably so.


55 posted on 04/28/2014 6:51:42 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
I don’t believe there are enough people of integrity left in America to elect Palin.

There aren't. There's just you and me left.
56 posted on 04/28/2014 6:52:14 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hey, the checks from the suckers clear; win or lose, that's all that matters to him...


57 posted on 04/28/2014 6:55:07 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

You asked; “Why a minority man? Not a white woman?”

For the same reason that Michelle Malkin an Asian woman shouldn’t be nominated.

The heterophobic democrats will not allow a non-lesbian female, especially an attractive one to run without destroying her if they can. I doubt seriously they’d let a fiscally conservative lesbian be nominated either but that is another issue. The truth is the LSM is less afraid of conservative men than conservative women are less afraid of men.

A minority male can still deal with issues where a female would have to answer endless questions about “Is that child really yours or was it one your daughter had? How much did you spend on that dress? Tell us the truth, didn’t you really sleep around like a slut on speed when you were 15?” as opposed to asking Alan West or Ted Cruz: “Don’t you think there is still a racist streak in this country?”

The questions conservative women get asked are at best asinine though generally insulting and demeaning while those asked to minority male conservatives possibly exhibit flawed thinking do at least allows for a candidate to express a valid position. If Sarah Palin or whatever other conservative woman was running simply refused to answer the dumb insulting questions they’d be accused of hiding something. They are in a no win situation because the left is so brain washed that they cannot believe that any woman would be conservative. They cannot win if they are prevented from getting their message out and the LSM would ensure that they didn’t by simply calling them liars, wh*res and brain washed sex toys of the elite 1%.

At least that is opinion.


58 posted on 04/28/2014 6:57:30 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise
But against Hillary? Dead losers.

You would think that Hillary was Godzilla to hear you talk. Walker won Wisconsin and took on the entire NATIONAL union apparatus in a formerly Dem state in the rust belt on the hill they picked to die on. When the Hillary scandals get reprised, she will have NOTHING on Walker. It is also hard to paint Walker as a meany.

Pence would maul Hillary in debates and doesn't make stupid mistakes.

Both men could get the base to come out. The trick is to get one of the four (Cruz, Pence, Walker and Palin) to be anointed before the primaries so the vote doesn't get split for Jeb Bush. Palin is perfectly positioned to do the anointing, and would probably go with Cruz, unless a dark horse like Susana Martinez gets into the race in a serious way, and maybe not even then.
59 posted on 04/28/2014 6:57:58 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I'm a Contra" -- President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
There aren't. There's just you and me left.

Are you sure about him?
60 posted on 04/28/2014 6:58:57 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I'm a Contra" -- President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson