And, just what do you expect him to do? I suspect even if one court rules differently than the others, and it goes to the SC - they will rule 5-4 in favor of gay marriage. The outcome would be the same. That doesn’t mean we have to accept it in our hearts. Let the deviants live their deviant lifestyles, because they are the ones who have to answer to God. Had harry reid and bammy not packed the courts with flaming liberals - the outcome might have been different. Just like abortion - we are now seeing victory in this after so many years. Roe v. Wade passed in 1973. I don’t care how the courts rule - it is and always will be an abomination in God’s eyes.
What I would like him to do is NOT ISSUE A STATEMENT IMMEDIATELY SAYING IT’S OVER.
There was absolutely NO PRESSURE at all for him to issue such a statement.
He could have been totally silent on it. Or if asked, he could have said he still was personally against it, but that perhaps in the future there’d be other opportunities.
We just roll over and immediately offer this crap when it’s not necessary.
He also could have pointed out the bigger issue of judges legislating from the bench, instead of the people. the people of WI amended the constitution - and it’s no small feat to do that, because two different sessions of the legislature have to pass it as well. It would have been a great time to explain the issue, and use this as a perfect example of the judicial overreach going on in this country, where unaccountable unelected judges thwart the will of the people that follow valid, legal laws. It’s also a great example to discuss states rights and 10th amendment issues.
He failed to do any of this.