To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well, it’s novel. I guess if you have the opinion that 1) pandering to independents hurts you with the base and other voters who might agree with or at least respect you, and 2) “independents” as typically defined are a bunch of wishy-washy know-nothings who don’t pay attention until the week before election day, then this might have a shot.
4 posted on
12/15/2014 10:53:50 AM PST by
kevkrom
(I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
To: kevkrom
“independents” need to be convinced of the superiority of conservative ideas,
not pandered to.
8 posted on
12/15/2014 10:55:16 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: kevkrom
... this might have a shot.Reagan thought so.
19 posted on
12/15/2014 11:05:38 AM PST by
Louis Foxwell
(This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson